tell me im wrong please
![Sad :(](./images/smilies/icon_sad.gif)
Moderator: Senior Hosts
fr_Zooloo wrote:oh so this thing where some guys maintain r1 (ps3) during the shot to make it an "approach" shot (when it s just a winner attempt) and step back instead of running the net really gives an advantage?
tell me im wrong please, it would be really lame and they look like idiots while performing this, it kills the esthetics of the game in my opinion.
PerfectAce wrote:Mack2300 wrote:To be honest, I have played WT quite a bit but I haven't encountered that much cheese. The only thing that really bugs me is when people use rt + x (dropshot) as a volley when they are at the net. That seems really cheap to me. Either attempt a proper volley or don't bother at all.
Sorry mate, but I completely desagree. What´s the problem to use drop volleys? Maybe it can be considered cheesy when overused, but say that the shot itself it´s not a "proper" one?!?! This is nonsense for me...
fr_Zooloo wrote:oh so this thing where some guys maintain r1 (ps3) during the shot to make it an "approach" shot (when it s just a winner attempt) and step back instead of running the net really gives an advantage?
tell me im wrong please, it would be really lame and they look like idiots while performing this, it kills the esthetics of the game in my opinion.
djarvik wrote:because the game has a magical button called RB, that "snaps" your player a good hitting position completely disregarding the speed stat in the process. It is very clear if you look at the animation just before your player hits the ball....it looks like you are a good 2-3 feet away from the ball, then you magically zzzzooooooommmm into the spot and hit the shot.
Mack2300 wrote:There is even less element of risk hitting a drop volley at the net than playing a dropshot. It is far too effective considering how easy it is to make and it renders normal volleys useless. IMO, I consider it cheesy. Had one match before where my opponent hit nothing but drop volleys every time he would rush the net. It looked ridiculous.
djarvik wrote:I can be very "physical" with my 52 power![]()
I can! When I am in control of the point.
Honestly, 80-85 power is what I think is aggressive baseliners should CAP at. If it goes any higher, then your strokes should actually go down to high-mid 60s.
Anything above that is lame. Why lame? Because it gives you an advantage (if used right) that is not supposed to be there ...because the game has a magical button called RB, that "snaps" your player a good hitting position completely disregarding the speed stat in the process. It is very clear if you look at the animation just before your player hits the ball....it looks like you are a good 2-3 feet away from the ball, then you magically zzzzooooooommmm into the spot and hit the shot. If you are a power baseline, try to play without that button....and see how many balls you will reach and how many outs and miss-timed shots you will hit. (assuming your opponent can move the ball around a bit). Sadly, this was a problem in TS3 as well. It is still here.
This supposed to be a reposition button, AFTER the shot. Instead, it acts as a "helper" getting into position BEFORE the shot. That is what I find lame and that is the primary factor in low speed still being effective. It renders your position skills almost useless and all you have to worry about is timing.
ILuvBillVal wrote:Mack2300 wrote:There is even less element of risk hitting a drop volley at the net than playing a dropshot. It is far too effective considering how easy it is to make and it renders normal volleys useless. IMO, I consider it cheesy. Had one match before where my opponent hit nothing but drop volleys every time he would rush the net. It looked ridiculous.
You are 100% right without a doubt. Also, Bretton James does more than just have a lame setup, he constantly serves out wide when in trouble and also uses slice constantly. It's an awful experience and robs the game of any fun whatsoever. He's not alone, though. There is an unfortunately high number of players now involved with the ITST that are employing similar or worse tactics that I've experienced first hand.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests