Verdasco = Best player at the Oz Open in 2009 (if you don't count Nadal).
Davydenko has been great, but Verdasco, in Melbourne, is better



Prediction = Fernando in four.
What do you think?
picachu211 wrote:2009 Kuala Lumpur Malaysia Hard F
Davydenko 6-4, 7-5
2009 Roland Garros France Clay R16
Davydenko 6-2, 6-2, 6-4
2006 ATP Masters Series Rome Italy Clay R32
Davydenko 6-1, 3-6, 6-0
2005 ATP Masters Series Rome Italy Clay R64
Verdasco 6-3, 7-5
2005 Rotterdam The Netherlands Hard R32
Davydenko 7-5, 2-6, 6-4
2004 ATP Masters Series Paris France Carpet R64
Davydenko 6-2, 6-3
2004 Long Island New York, USA Hard R16
Davydenko 7-6(4), 6-3
Davydenko has only lost one set to Verdasco on hard, I'll say Davydenko in straight or 4 sets.
Cro Morgan wrote:Absolutely zero, none of those results were from Melbourne. Verdasco is a different creature at the Australian Open. In short, Davydenko doesn't stand a chance.
picachu211 wrote:Cro Morgan wrote:Absolutely zero, none of those results were from Melbourne. Verdasco is a different creature at the Australian Open. In short, Davydenko doesn't stand a chance.
Before 2009, Verdasco has never even passed 2R at Australian Open.
But I guess you would argue he's a different creature on Plexicushion...
EDIT: even with the SF last year, his record was merely 9-6, his worst Grand Slam.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests