Lance Armstrong...

Talk about anything unrelated to tennis or the ITST.

Moderator: Senior Hosts

Postby Vieira151 » Sat, 25 Aug 2012 20:08

Cro Morgan wrote:
Tamthewasp wrote:What does lifting weights transform muscle into? Sunshine? Ye crack me up Paul.


Natural is what you're born with. When you lift weights your muscles become unnatural. Drug enhancement is unnatural -- so is exercise and lifting weights.


Oh, so Lumberjacks would be cheating if they entered the weightlifting competition? I don't see how exercise is unnatural, considering we should technically still be hunter gatherers. Sports and going to the gym can be considered unnatural, but exercise in general is not.
PSN - Vieira151


"These, are not the hammer...
The hammer is my penis."


"No wine for me. Strange enough things happen when my head is clear. I want to know the difference."
User avatar
Vieira151
 
Posts: 3541
Joined: Mon, 21 Jul 2008 13:36
Location: Falkirk, Scotland

Postby Tamthewasp » Sat, 25 Aug 2012 20:26

Hunt gather involves walking. Walking is natural and that is excersing 2.
To win is to achieve success. To compete and lose and try again is greatness
Tamthewasp
 
Posts: 1678
Joined: Mon, 22 Aug 2011 23:20

Postby Cro Morgan » Sat, 25 Aug 2012 21:19

Vieira151 wrote:Oh, so Lumberjacks would be cheating if they entered the weightlifting competition?.


Perfectly okay, as long as they didn't train for the competition by lifting weights.

Tamthewasp wrote:Walking is natural and that is excersing 2.


Walking is natural only when you're walking for a reason (i.e. walking to your car; walking to a friend's house). Walking is unnatural when it's done for no practical reason (i.e going for a walk, as in, "do you want to walk around the block to get some exercise").
User avatar
Cro Morgan
ITST Manager
 
Posts: 7195
Joined: Sat, 29 Jan 2005 12:20

Postby Tamthewasp » Sat, 25 Aug 2012 21:53

Walking around my country because it has beautiful landscapes. It's nature so natural., In America walking to the car is probably the most exercise anybody gets.

Are you not from the Valleys Paul? Maybe you could introduce them to xcersise then tell them it's the devils work
To win is to achieve success. To compete and lose and try again is greatness
Tamthewasp
 
Posts: 1678
Joined: Mon, 22 Aug 2011 23:20

Postby Coolhand Texas » Sun, 26 Aug 2012 00:09

What I am getting from this argument is that I need to sit on my couch and watch tv and that way I should be perfectly natural :lol: :lol:

another reason for us to become even more overweight :lol: :lol:
Image
Image

Winner of Roland Garros MS
You dont mess with James Blake!!
User avatar
Coolhand Texas
 
Posts: 5495
Joined: Wed, 14 Jan 2009 02:34

Postby Saarbrigga » Sun, 26 Aug 2012 00:35

C4iLL wrote:Ullrich = drugs as well ; in 2000 the winner is then Christophe Moreau, OH YEAH 8)


Beloki?

He was tested positive after his brutal crash back in 2003...maybe he was clean in 2000... :lol:
Former Gamertags: drago110482 (2009-2010); Niten Doraku (2010-2011), SchwingerMongo (2011-2012)
User avatar
Saarbrigga
 
Posts: 805
Joined: Thu, 21 May 2009 00:49
Location: Saarbruecken, Germany

Postby Cro Morgan » Sun, 26 Aug 2012 03:45

Coolhand Texas wrote:What I am getting from this argument is that I need to sit on my couch and watch tv and that way I should be perfectly natural :lol: :lol:

another reason for us to become even more overweight :lol: :lol:


On the contrary.

Sitting on a couch burns 68 calories per hour (assuming a body weight of 150 lbs). If you don't stuff your face with food and drink, you're actually losing weight each and every time you sit on a couch (watching TV is optional).
User avatar
Cro Morgan
ITST Manager
 
Posts: 7195
Joined: Sat, 29 Jan 2005 12:20

Re: Lance Armstrong...

Postby Amazing Matheja » Sun, 26 Aug 2012 08:33

Saarbrigga wrote:Read the story?

Seems he s gonna lose all 7 tour victories and a lifelong ban for any sport.

What do you think about it?


I would say just like Greg Lemond's wife :
"At least !"
This guy is the biggest thief in cycling history !... Hope he will have to give money back too.

Here are, from "Libération" (a french newspaper) the "clean" winners (i.e : with no cases) :

1999 : Nardello - 7th (Zulle was in Festina's trouble, Escartin was with Dr Ferrari...)
2000 : Nardello - 10th (Armstrong, Ullrich, Beloki,... Haha !...)
2001 : Kivilev - 4th (Armstrong, Ullrich, Beloki,... Haha !...)
2002 : Carlos Sastre - 10th (Armstrong, Beloki, Rumsas...)
2003 : Zubeldia - 5th (Armstrong, Vinokourov,...)
2004 : Carlos Sastre - 5th (Arsmtrong, Kloden, Basso,...)
2005 : Cadel Evans - 7th (Arsmtrong, Basso, Ullrich,...)

Personally, I think they should not give a winners to those tour...
And Honestly, and it hurts me to say that, I wonder if they shouldn't stop the Tour for a while... They broke their toy, they* need time to think about it...

* the "children" : The riders, the UCI (who protected a guy like Armstrong, and who tolerates guys like Riis as team boss), the CIO, Bruynell, Team bosses, Doctors, Journalists,... Thx to all these, the Tour, since the end of the 80's and the discovery of EPO, is a big and dangerous joke ! It was not that "extrem" before... I think ! ^^

Saarbrigga wrote:...

All of them (except of Kloeden) were tested positive once or more...

Well, I suggest you "google" "University Clinic of Freibourg Kloden" ;)





(Oh! And you guys really don't like that "cyclism.." topic huh ? So you prefer to create topic again and again ! ^^ It's "sad" cause with one topic it's easier to follow discussions than with a dozen of topic talking about the same thing...)
User avatar
Amazing Matheja
 
Posts: 2182
Joined: Thu, 14 Aug 2008 11:23

Previous

Return to Off Topic

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests

cron