Moderator: Senior Hosts
your right im gonna go buy it too for xbox 360 even without playing the demo i could see the player animations were better than ts4 this something that if 2k incorporate it will take the top spin series another level above VT . also what is the net play like could upload a video of you playing that if it is not too much hassleAndyMurray ITST wrote::oops:
I previously gave my impressions of Virtua Tennis 4 playing the ps3 demo, and i was not impressed at all (see previous post).
Having got the complete game I have to say that I have completely changed my mind. Ive been playing the game for hours and its so addictive. Its still fairly arcadey, but they have slowed down the rallies and have really improved the physics from Vt3. You have to train up your character first to really see this which is why the demo is awful!
charging up shots is great and player animations on hitting the ball are better than Topspin 4. Players jump into shots and look great running around forehands etc. The new super shot button is excellent aswell and you can turn off the awkward camera for this.
Online is much better too. I really recommend this game now having had a complete turn around in my opinion!
Graphically the xbox 360 version i think is way better. The ps3 version is less clear for some reason, more fuzzy. All in all its a great game, and only slighty inferior to the excellent TopSpin 4. If you liked Virtua Tennis 3, this game is better than that , and so much better than the awful Vt2009
Jason Fernandes wrote:Well as for the courts, I personally don't mind but the AO being on a green court is beyond stupid, we're not living in 2006...
As for the game a few things I don't like:
1. Slice seems useless
2. Same player reaction when a player wins
3. Crowd isn't really that dynamic
4. Hate when the player throws the racquet and catches it, far too often and at stupid times (like when missing a first serve).
5. Some players look poor (eg. Nadal, looks beyond skinny)
6. Umpire doesn't say the score in tie-breaks.
7. Every time a player serves (beginning of service game or has a serve in a tie-break) the umpire says "xxx to serve"
8. After every game there's an animation of both players sitting down, even after a game where there shouldn't be a changeover or rest (like 2-1 for example)
I mean most of these are minor things but still you would think some of these should have never been 'issues' in the first place, but still I'm loving the game!
My bad, I meant the game after 2-1, so when it's 2-2. Just stupid as even when play resumes the players are on the correct sides, makes no sense.Coolhand Texas wrote:Jason Fernandes wrote:Well as for the courts, I personally don't mind but the AO being on a green court is beyond stupid, we're not living in 2006...
As for the game a few things I don't like:
1. Slice seems useless
2. Same player reaction when a player wins
3. Crowd isn't really that dynamic
4. Hate when the player throws the racquet and catches it, far too often and at stupid times (like when missing a first serve).
5. Some players look poor (eg. Nadal, looks beyond skinny)
6. Umpire doesn't say the score in tie-breaks.
7. Every time a player serves (beginning of service game or has a serve in a tie-break) the umpire says "xxx to serve"
8. After every game there's an animation of both players sitting down, even after a game where there shouldn't be a changeover or rest (like 2-1 for example)
I mean most of these are minor things but still you would think some of these should have never been 'issues' in the first place, but still I'm loving the game!
there is a changeover at 2-1.
Jason Fernandes wrote:My bad, I meant the game after 2-1, so when it's 2-2. Just stupid as even when play resumes the players are on the correct sides, makes no sense.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest