Contador tested positive

Talk about anything unrelated to tennis or the ITST.

Moderator: Senior Hosts

Postby Amazing Matheja » Fri, 01 Oct 2010 14:52

Sorry... I can't resist! :P
Note that i drew a veil over the Puerto's case... ;)
User avatar
Amazing Matheja
 
Posts: 2182
Joined: Thu, 14 Aug 2008 11:23

Postby Saarbrigga » Sat, 02 Oct 2010 10:38

According to german media, Contador was tested in köln (cologne) some weeks before the Tour and in his blood is evidence about own-blood-doping (i don t know the german word for "Eigenblutdoping"). :lol:
Former Gamertags: drago110482 (2009-2010); Niten Doraku (2010-2011), SchwingerMongo (2011-2012)
User avatar
Saarbrigga
 
Posts: 805
Joined: Thu, 21 May 2009 00:49
Location: Saarbruecken, Germany

Postby Amazing Matheja » Tue, 05 Oct 2010 09:37

Niten Doraku wrote:...and in his blood is evidence about own-blood-doping (i don t know the german word for "Eigenblutdoping"). :lol:


Plastic marks were found in his blood... Same kind of marks they founded in Vinokourov's blood... You know? When Vino was convinced of autotransfusion doping at that famous Tour De France... When Rasmussen was flying over the hills... And when I saw something i never thought i would : Someone (Rasmussen) grabbing the brakes while climbing the Alpes d'Huez! :shock: Oh! And Contador, Evans, were there too... Following Rasmussen quite easily...
Ha! :lol: I always like when climbers suddenly become great "wheeler" (= time trial specialists)... And i don't talk when "wheelers" suddenly become climbers....
Cycling is so great nowadays... Plastic in blood?.... :?
User avatar
Amazing Matheja
 
Posts: 2182
Joined: Thu, 14 Aug 2008 11:23

Postby jayl0ve » Tue, 05 Oct 2010 13:29

What a filthy sport. Seriously.
jayl0ve
 
Posts: 9242
Joined: Sat, 25 Nov 2006 15:25
Location: LONG BEACH, CALIFORNIA, UNITED STATES OF EDBERG

Postby emate007 » Tue, 05 Oct 2010 13:45

Haha... I'm not sure if it's because of the ridiculous testing requirements of the French or the traceable doping habits of all cyclists, but I've heard more about doping in cycling than any sport I regularly follow.

Side note - I do enjoy baseball, and realize the contradiction. But with no public ownership it's "OK" to take HGH in baseball. As long as you don´t get caught.
User avatar
emate007
 
Posts: 2447
Joined: Thu, 04 Dec 2008 23:54

Postby Chederer » Tue, 05 Oct 2010 14:42

emate007 wrote:Haha... I'm not sure if it's because of the ridiculous testing requirements of the French or the traceable doping habits of all cyclists, but I've heard more about doping in cycling than any sport I regularly follow.

Side note - I do enjoy baseball, and realize the contradiction. But with no public ownership it's "OK" to take HGH in baseball. As long as you don´t get caught.


THATS WHAT HE SAID... :lol: :lol: :lol:

Image
MURRAY?!?!

GamerTag CHEDERER
Chederer
 
Posts: 3660
Joined: Sat, 31 Jan 2009 22:06

Postby Amazing Matheja » Wed, 06 Oct 2010 10:06

Oops! Another positive test for Alberto? (After the 1st one about Clenbu and maybe some plastic, a 2nd one that seems to be positive about plastic... 2nd test made before the 1st one...)

http://www.nytimes.com/2010/10/05/sport ... ref=sports

B. Kohl testimony, at the end of the article, is... somehow priceless! :P

By the way, all those methods are not for cyclists only, you know...
I'm more than sure that those doping methods are also used in soccer, tennis, track & field, swimming, basket, rugby, baseball.... Why you only hear about "doping in cycling" is because yes, cycling is a 90% physic sports only (where you need a lot of O2 going quickly to muscles and lambs), but also because cycling is THE sport where most efforts are done to "fight" and find doping... (well, looking at what the other sports do to eradicate doping : nothing!)
User avatar
Amazing Matheja
 
Posts: 2182
Joined: Thu, 14 Aug 2008 11:23

Postby Amazing Matheja » Mon, 06 Feb 2012 12:47

Bye bye Alberto ! Thanks for the fun ! :lol:
User avatar
Amazing Matheja
 
Posts: 2182
Joined: Thu, 14 Aug 2008 11:23

Postby Moralspain » Mon, 06 Feb 2012 13:32

Amazing Matheja wrote:Bye bye Alberto ! Thanks for the fun ! :lol:


Haha, problem here is that he can compete again in augost, i don't get it, i guess it's 2 years from 2010, which is a nonsense because he hasn't stopped racing
BTW any news about Armstrong and all that Landis said about him?, just asking, don't know if TAS has already said something about it
Never underestimate the pain of a person, because in all honesty, everyone is struggling. Some people are just better at hiding it than others.
User avatar
Moralspain
ITST Manager
 
Posts: 7175
Joined: Wed, 04 Apr 2007 13:23
Location: MALLORCA (Balearic Islands)

Postby SlicerITST » Mon, 06 Feb 2012 14:44

Moralspain wrote:
Amazing Matheja wrote:Bye bye Alberto ! Thanks for the fun ! :lol:


Haha, problem here is that he can compete again in augost, i don't get it, i guess it's 2 years from 2010, which is a nonsense because he hasn't stopped racing


Yeah, this is the weirdest thing ever. It makes absolutely no sense to me.

BTW any news about Armstrong and all that Landis said about him?, just asking, don't know if TAS has already said something about it


This case has been dropped last week.
\'Readers are plentiful; thinkers are rare.\'
User avatar
SlicerITST
ITST Manager
 
Posts: 5974
Joined: Sun, 17 Oct 2004 15:17

Postby Moralspain » Tue, 07 Feb 2012 22:02

BTW as far as i could heard the sentence doesn't say Contador took drugs, CAS couldn't prove that fact , but the point is that Alberto Contador couldn't justify why he had clenbuterol in his blood either, kinda strange final judgement though, i mean he was from beginning presummed guilty and not presummed innocent, i guess that cycling is different because i think it's the opposite with the regular justice system
Can't give a personal opinion on this because i'd need more info.


Edit: yep i checked , the law for cycling is a bit different, you have to prove your innocence not viceversa, and here Contador was unable to prove why he was tested positive with clenbuterol, CAS doesn't know what happened and couldn't prove Contador took drugs and has no idea where the 5 pictograms come from, CAS just added that the “presence of clenbuterol was more likely caused by the ingestion of a contaminated food supplement” but according to law CAS didn't have to prove anything but Contador had to, so i guess the sentence is correct
Never underestimate the pain of a person, because in all honesty, everyone is struggling. Some people are just better at hiding it than others.
User avatar
Moralspain
ITST Manager
 
Posts: 7175
Joined: Wed, 04 Apr 2007 13:23
Location: MALLORCA (Balearic Islands)

Postby SlicerITST » Wed, 08 Feb 2012 01:16

I guess it kinda makes sense. CAS can never proof how exactly someone gets something in his blood. There are just so many ways. If they had to cases would take years to complete.
\'Readers are plentiful; thinkers are rare.\'
User avatar
SlicerITST
ITST Manager
 
Posts: 5974
Joined: Sun, 17 Oct 2004 15:17

Postby Corbon » Wed, 08 Feb 2012 12:35

Cycling is the dirtiest sport in the world with the weakest argument: "Everyone is dong it so why not me?"

Based on calories spent per day (or hour, don't remember) the Tour de France is, physically, the most demanding sports event in the world and with so much money involved by now and the advances in medicine it's not ridiculous to thnk that at least half of the racers are doped in one way or another. Remember Jan Ulrich and his toothpaste thing? Maybe they should all switch to coke (after consulting Martina Hingis about the side effects and aftermath) to level the field and then claim it's a bad habit.
Last edited by Corbon on Wed, 08 Feb 2012 15:14, edited 2 times in total.
User avatar
Corbon
 
Posts: 1735
Joined: Sun, 27 Nov 2011 23:37
Location: Germany

Postby Amazing Matheja » Wed, 08 Feb 2012 12:57

Actually, CAS had its "proof" : Positive control. It was up to Alberto to explain the "why" or the "how"... CAS has not accepted Alberto explanation, so he's suspended.

Haha, problem here is that he can compete again in augost, i don't get it, i guess it's 2 years from 2010, which is a nonsense because he hasn't stopped racing



Yeah, this is the weirdest thing ever. It makes absolutely no sense to me.

Same here.
Funny thing is that Bjarne Riis has to "defend" Alberto for what he did in 2010... Year when Riis was Schleck 's boss and so he was Alberto's "ennemy" ! :D

But another point is : When Alberto will be able to compete again, if he wins races, he will NOT score UCI's points for 1 or 2 years ! So his team won't have the benefit of his wins = no points ! So maybe no teams will want Contador because : Huge salary, but no points earned for the UCI World Tour...
I believe Riis is already looking for another top cyclist for this year... And maybe Alberto will struggle to find a good new team...
And this year maybe we'll only have a BMC/Schleck duel... Not very exciting if you ask me...

Corbon wrote:...with so much money involved by now and the advances in medicine it's not ridiculous to thnk that at least half of the athletes are doped in one way or another....

Fixed. :lol:

Just saying this, because I believe all kind of athletes are highly* doped... In every sports... Even curling, darts... ^^

* : To me, since EPO, and high "medecine" assists, it's dopng at another kind of level than "before"...
User avatar
Amazing Matheja
 
Posts: 2182
Joined: Thu, 14 Aug 2008 11:23

Postby SlicerITST » Wed, 08 Feb 2012 13:42

Same here.
Funny thing is that Bjarne Riis has to "defend" Alberto for what he did in 2010... Year when Riis was Schleck 's boss and so he was Alberto's "ennemy" !

But another point is : When Alberto will be able to compete again, if he wins races, he will NOT score UCI's points for 1 or 2 years ! So his team won't have the benefit of his wins = no points ! So maybe no teams will want Contador because : Huge salary, but no points earned for the UCI World Tour...
I believe Riis is already looking for another top cyclist for this year... And maybe Alberto will struggle to find a good new team...
And this year maybe we'll only have a BMC/Schleck duel... Not very exciting if you ask me...


I did hear Riis his team will loose the points of the last year gained by Contador. That means they might loose their license.

If he also looses his points for the next 1 to 2 year i would find that a bit unfair. You are right to say he will have a tough time finding a new team. Or at least no team will be build around him. That team will have to have other stars as well.

This year's TdF is a time trail heaven(almost 100km of ITT). I dont really see anyone beating Evans if he stays on his bike. I dont see Schleck as being able to beat Evans in an ITT. I wont rule it out but i dont see it happening. Hence i am going to name two talented guys i think might surprise this year. Thomas de Gendt and Peter Velits. The first one was very good in the last time trail last year and had a good last week in the mountains. He didnt finish high in the final standings but that was mainly due to a big fall in the first week. Velits might have his breakthrough year. Very big talent.
\'Readers are plentiful; thinkers are rare.\'
User avatar
SlicerITST
ITST Manager
 
Posts: 5974
Joined: Sun, 17 Oct 2004 15:17

PreviousNext

Return to Off Topic

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests