This court was already used two years ago in Davis Cup matches and in some tournaments. It has a very good connection even if it has an audience. I, for example played against Phil Hess two days ago on it and it worked very well. However for matches for example between Europeans and North or South Americans I reccomend Hamburg. Between Europeans I prefer Chennai. And the audience gives a better feeling to the game.
P.S: Berg you remember you reccomend the Tashkent court. Lately players that usually have good connection are complaining about this court. For example against Sunny or Punni I have a very good connection and when he played last month on that court it has many bugs, like the player doesn't move after service or the ball goes too slow, compared with Antananarivo where I never saw Punni and Sunny have what they had on Tashkent. I think that maybe it would be better if Tashkent is forgotten as an second option. A second option could be the Hangar, indoor. In my opinion it's a very good court, a bit dark for some players but I see quite well and for example against Elargento we always play on that court and we have a much better connection that on Antananarivo. If people find it too dark I think it would be better to stay only with Antananarivo.