Has the Mutant taken advantage of it?

by **Samael** » Sun, 18 Aug 2013 10:03

After bashing Andy the Mutant Murray for the past... like 1000 years, i admitted he deserved to win those 2 Slams. I can't help not to wonder how come he really managed to do it...

My opinion is that he took advantage of the situation... Djokovic, Fed and Nadal, for diff reasons, werent as competitive as before and the Mutant, even though he didnt play a lot better than in his other GS finals, was good enough...

Ofc, that doesnt change anything. Nadal or Fed were in same situation for lots of years, but... I still think The Mutant sucks...

by **Murderface84** » Sun, 18 Aug 2013 11:23

Hahaha what's up Dragos, still fighting THE GOOD FIGHT...F**K THE MUTANT

by **djarvik** » Sun, 18 Aug 2013 13:44

Finally.....thank you.

Yet..hehe

by **Florian** » Sun, 18 Aug 2013 18:26

Murray doesn't play tennis like others, he plays chess. Guys with no weaknesses in their game can play that way. Djokovic can play chess sometimes but he's got more will to show the opponent who's the boss on the court, and Murray can cope with being dominated all match long.

Murray and Simon used to play pretty much the same way, except that Murray's wings can produce more from a random ball, and he's got a much better use of slice. Now Murray realised that he can be very dangerous when using his fh full power, he creates many problems.

I'd love to see a Murray Nadal on hard court right now...

by **Corbon** » Sun, 18 Aug 2013 19:36

Murray-Djokovic is one of the dullest rivalries I have ever witnessed.

by **Florian** » Sun, 18 Aug 2013 20:26

Corbon wrote:Murray-Djokovic is one of the dullest rivalries I have ever witnessed.

How about Isner-Raonic ? ^^

If you like slides and fun better watch Monfils

by **Amazing Matheja** » Mon, 19 Aug 2013 10:40

Florian wrote:Murray doesn't play tennis like others, he plays chess. Guys with no weaknesses in their game can play that way. Djokovic can play chess sometimes but he's got more will to show the opponent who's the boss on the court, and Murray can cope with being dominated all match long.

Murray and Simon used to play pretty much the same way, except that Murray's wings can produce more from a random ball, and he's got a much better use of slice. Now Murray realised that he can be very dangerous when using his fh full power, he creates many problems.

I'd love to see a Murray Nadal on hard court right now...

I read (or heard) long ago that one of Murray's idol was Santoro... A lot of weaknesses but an incredible "chess player" on court ! Ask Safin ! ^^

by **Corbon** » Mon, 19 Aug 2013 16:11

Florian wrote:
Corbon wrote:Murray-Djokovic is one of the dullest rivalries I have ever witnessed.

How about Isner-Raonic ? ^^

If you like slides and fun better watch Monfils

That's not a rivalry, that's just two random Top 30 players getting drawn together now and then.

by **Amazing Matheja** » Mon, 19 Aug 2013 16:18

Raonic is #11
Isner is #14... and the new Karlovic ? (to me, he can hold his serve... Not a lot more... That's why his matches last that long sometimes : He's unbreakable but can't break so... :/)

by **djarvik** » Mon, 19 Aug 2013 16:34

Both Isner and Raonic are WWWWAAAAAYYYY better off the ground than Karlovic. No comparasing.

And this:
http://www.atpworldtour.com/Players/Hea ... 6&oId=R975

is no revelry.

I am with Corbon, Djoker VS Murry is a snooze fest.

I would not call it Chess BTW - maybe checkers :lol:

by **Amazing Matheja** » Mon, 19 Aug 2013 17:19

djarvik wrote:Both Isner and Raonic are WWWWAAAAAYYYY better off the ground than Karlovic. No comparasing.

Ok about Raonic, but I do have some doubts about Isner... Isner FH is a bit better (more secure when "risked" #TopSpin3 ^^), but the rest is more or less equal (my opinion, I haven't seen thousands matchs of Isner, but he never "impressed" me... raonic did).

by **Florian** » Mon, 19 Aug 2013 17:33

Anyway Raonic and Isner just can't move on court, Delpo is a feather compared to them

by **djarvik** » Mon, 19 Aug 2013 18:10

Amazing Matheja wrote:
djarvik wrote:Both Isner and Raonic are WWWWAAAAAYYYY better off the ground than Karlovic. No comparasing.

Ok about Raonic, but I do have some doubts about Isner... Isner FH is a bit better (more secure when "risked" #TopSpin3 ^^), but the rest is more or less equal (my opinion, I haven't seen thousands matchs of Isner, but he never "impressed" me... raonic did).

That's it.

It is rather clear to me man. WAY better FH, better BH, better movement/faster, smarter player....can even defend a bit. Karlovic is better vollier and MUCH better SVier...but off the ground TOTALLY useless.

by **Amazing Matheja** » Mon, 19 Aug 2013 19:26

Not totally convinced yet, but I trust you man.

by **Corbon** » Mon, 19 Aug 2013 19:44

Isner's forehand, especially on 1-2 shots, and his movement is miles better than Karloman's.

Has the Mutant taken advantage of it?

Has the Mutant taken advantage of it?

Re: Has the Mutant taken advantage of it?

Re: Has the Mutant taken advantage of it?

Re: Has the Mutant taken advantage of it?

Re: Has the Mutant taken advantage of it?

Re: Has the Mutant taken advantage of it?

Re: Has the Mutant taken advantage of it?

Re: Has the Mutant taken advantage of it?

Re: Has the Mutant taken advantage of it?

Re: Has the Mutant taken advantage of it?

Re: Has the Mutant taken advantage of it?

Re: Has the Mutant taken advantage of it?

Re: Has the Mutant taken advantage of it?

Re: Has the Mutant taken advantage of it?

Re: Has the Mutant taken advantage of it?

Who is online