Sim??? what a joke

by **jayl0ve** » Tue, 06 Sep 2011 15:22

hahaha such a mob mentality here at times.

by **PerfectAce** » Tue, 06 Sep 2011 15:24

Yeah, I´m a srub too, because I wanna play tennis, and not SF with rackets. Poor of me... :cry:

by **Tamthewasp** » Tue, 06 Sep 2011 15:27

Your implying people on here are not to bright. Thw WT is where you ho to win at all costs. ITST is a different ball game so to speak, you know this.,I agree with the article but it has no relevance here

by **jayl0ve** » Tue, 06 Sep 2011 15:28

It has nothing to do with playing SF with racquets, or playing 'unfair', or playing to piss people off, you are making a straw man argument....so just forget it you wouldn't understand anyways

by **PerfectAce** » Tue, 06 Sep 2011 15:32

Yeah, I´m really dumb. Sorry for that. I´ll do a philosophy course to try to understand the depths of the human mind.

by **jayl0ve** » Tue, 06 Sep 2011 15:33

k, cool

by **LokiSharpShootr** » Tue, 06 Sep 2011 15:37

jayl0ve wrote:It has nothing to do with playing SF with racquets, or playing 'unfair', or playing to piss people off, you are making a straw man argument....so just forget it you wouldn't understand anyways

Wouldnt understand? please man who you think you´re talking to? a 13 year old kid who cant read a article and understand what it says?.

I understood the article, it says that these cheese tactics make gamers step up their game so that they can counter-cheese and counter the counter-cheese, but it doesnt apply here you know why?

beacause of this

I agree, it doesn't even matter if they're not working for you and I'm blasting them for winners, if you're hitting a drop shot every point you're just making the match retarded for both people.

Yours words taken from a diferent topic, cheese tactics make the game retarted for both people in TS4, unlike SF.

Do you understand or do i need to spell it out for you?

by **jayl0ve** » Tue, 06 Sep 2011 15:44

U mad bro?

by **safe_as_milk_** » Tue, 06 Sep 2011 15:46

jayl0ve wrote:Those 'rules of sportsmanship' though are the 'mental blocks' the article mentions. They're artificial.

Of course they're artificial, but it's not necessarily a negative.

jayl0ve wrote:Also see the point in the article where he says something to the effect of 'if a game isn't 'fun' when played at a high level, then that's the game's fault, not the player's'.

TS4 is just a far inferior game to SF2 so I guess it's a stretch, but I think a ton of that article applies.

This is the thing, this 'higher level'... the stuff he talks about with SF, I can accept that's at a higher level. 'i think TS is the other way round... the 'cheese' tactics aren't exactly sophisticated or complex, and it's higher level comes only when you put these artificial restraints in place.... If you're talking about people complaining about setups etc then i suppose it's a little more relevant, but it's still a different beast altogether

Re: the bit about it being the game's fault not the players- that might well be the case, but i see this place as good attempt at fixing it...

jayl0ve wrote:Also, the 'emphasis on winning' is not weird, these kind of articles and the strategies discussed therein are kinda aimed at tournament-level players (i.e guys who go to EVO to compete in Street Fighter), and winning is all that matters.

Fair enough.

by **LokiSharpShootr** » Tue, 06 Sep 2011 15:51

jayl0ve wrote:U mad bro?

Nops, im just unmasking a troll who wants to appear to have some knowledge of whats he´s saying and when confronted by facts and diferent points of view with actual grounds has one and only answer: U mad bro.

U mad bro?

by **jayl0ve** » Tue, 06 Sep 2011 16:18

nah, i think youre mad.

by **Amazing Matheja** » Tue, 06 Sep 2011 16:42

In my humble opinion (ahem!), some part (and maybe more than we think) of Jay's article could be largely applied to any games where competition, and therefore skills, is involved...
But maybe we could also "tone it down" a bit (is that a correct sentence?...) for the most part of us who just want to have fun...
My brilliant 2cents thought... ^^

Ho! And Ken>Ryu!!! :twisted:

Haha!

(And stop trying to compete with us Frenchies in the Art Of Discussion! Godammit'!! :lol:

)

by **supinesmokey13** » Tue, 06 Sep 2011 17:00

Amazing Matheja wrote:In my humble opinion (ahem!), some part (and maybe more than we think) of Jay's article could be largely applied to any games where competition, and therefore skills, is involved...
But maybe we could also "tone it down" a bit (is that a correct sentence?...) for the most part of us who just want to have fun...
My brilliant 2cents thought... ^^

Ho! And Ken>Ryu!!!

Haha!

l
(And stop trying to compete with us Frenchies in the Art Of Discussion! Godammit'!! )

:Like the article said by all means win so if can shoot you to wimn i will because it means im doing everything i can to win and erasing my mental block. BEWARE IF YOU PLAY ME I WILL SHOOT BECAUSE IM GONNA WINNA BY HOOK AND CROOK TO BECOME ELITE LOL !

by **Tamthewasp** » Tue, 06 Sep 2011 17:07

So does win by any means necassary also mean planting an explosive device on your opponents tv before u play waiting to the right moment to detonate.

by **supinesmokey13** » Tue, 06 Sep 2011 17:42

Tamthewasp wrote:So does win by any means necassary also mean planting an explosive device on your opponents tv before u play waiting to the right moment to detonate.

better yet I WILL LOOT your house and take your xbox away because IM ELITE AND MUST WIN BY ANY MEANS NECESSARY :lol:

Sim??? what a joke

Who is online