Moderator: Senior Hosts
oshiee wrote:not to be a buzz kill but itst is about making the game as realistic as possible and s/v is not realistic. 99.999999% of the pro tour are baseliners because s/v is not a feasible game plan in the modern game. Why should that not be reflected in the game itself? IMO s/v is too easy as it is. It is ridiculously unrealistic how many balls s/v can get to while at net. Sorry s/v fans but that style of play died 10 years ago and it died for a reason.
thats why there should be more tomny haas's, federer,tsonga, gasquet,nalbandian,llodra,harrison,dimitrov,,starkhosky,youzhny, and tipsaraveic's in tennis every match would be an all court epicVillaJ100 wrote:Maybe in the last decade, (although I believe the reasons for this aren't just 'technology and slow courts' but from the 1870's- to as you suggest, say 2002, playing the net was a winning strategy. A game where you could ONLY win from the back would be boring as hell. Likewise a game with SV only winning. But both? You just need to get on with it and improve against them. Variety is the spice of life! That's like saying you should only be able to win with one specific formation in FIFA, madden, NBA, or by driving a certain car in gran turismo.
RainingAmoeba79 wrote:ya, haas vs federer french open 09 is one of my fav matches.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest