djarvik wrote::lol: but that is the thing! It is really irrelevant what level was back then. They played their "own" top 10 and the results are based on that.
B O R G ! ! !
If one would say that Federer or Nadal is of the level of the likes as Borg, Sampras and Agassi the other guys in the top 10 should be as good as the players those legends faced as well.
If both top 10's are not of a similar level Federer and Nadal are either not living up to their potential or crap compared to the older guys in this list.