Match Record vs Top 10 Players

Talk about anything related to the ATP and WTA tours.

Match Record vs Top 10 Players

Postby djarvik » Thu, 16 Dec 2010 17:30

(taken from another forum, credit to Bud.)

Below are active ATP players' overall records versus top 10 opponents:


Active Player - W/L (% won)

Federer - 135/64 (67.84%) GS (16) *
Nadal - 72/38 (65.45%) GS (9) *
Murray - 42/31 (57.53%)
Hewitt - 60/60 (50.00%) GS (2) *
Tsonga - 15/19 (44.12%)
Djokovic - 39/50 (43.82%) GS (1)
Nalbandian - 33/47 (41.25%)
Ferrerro - 40/57 (41.24%) GS (1) *
Davydenko - 35/52 (40.23%)
Baghdatis - 16/24 (40.00%)
Hrbaty - 31/51 (37.80%)
Del Potro - 17/28 (37.78%) GS (1)
Haas - 41/68 (37.61%)
Roddick - 35/61 (36.46%) GS (1) *
Gonzalez - 27/49 (35.53%)
Monfils - 18/33 (35.29%)
Ferrer - 28/54 (34.17%)
Cilic - 10/20 (33.33%)
Soderling - 24/49 (32.88%)
Simon - 12/28 (30.00%)
Berdych - 20/51 (28.17%)
Blake - 18/50 (26.47%)
Wawrinka - 13/37 (26.00%)
Verdasco - 14/48 (22.58%)

Inactive Player - W/L (% won)

Borg - 67/28 (70.53%) GS (11) *
Becker - 121/65 (65.05%) GS (6) *
Lendl - 119/66 (64.32%) GS (8 ) *
Sampras - 124/71 (63.59%) GS (14) *
McEnroe - 85/64 (57.05%) GS (7) *
Agassi - 109/90 (54.77%) GS (8 ) *
Kuerten - 38/36 (51.35%) GS (3) *
Connors - 84/82 (50.60%) GS (8 ) *
Wilander - 54/54 (50.00%) GS (7) *
Safin - 49/50 (49.49%) GS (2) *
Edberg - 97/114 (45.97%) GS (6) *
Ivanisevic - 60/76 (44.12%) GS (1)
Nastase - 32/41 (43.84%) GS (2) *
Courier - 53/73 (42.06%) GS (4) *
Muster - 37/51 (42.05%) GS (1) *
Bruguera - 33/52 (38.82%) GS (2)
Vilas - 29/53 (35.37%) GS (4)
Chang - 51/94 (35.17%) GS (1)
Krickstein - 19/59 (24.36%)
Kriek - 11/37 (22.92%) GS (2)

GS Indicates a Grand Slam winner

* Indicates a current or former #1 player



Patterns (according to Bud):

► Murray should have definitely won a GS title already with his record. Big choker and/or underachiever in the important tournaments??

► Check out Borg's career record... mighty impressive when looking at Federer/Nadal!

► Nadal's percentage is higher than Sampras

► Roddick is a major overachiever who definitely maximized his talent!

► Chang was an even larger overachiever than Roddick. Fairly low success over top 10 and never reached #1... but won a GS title

► Kriek deserves the over-overachiever award. He possesses an anemic 23% win percentage over top 10 opponents while also winning 2 GS titles!
Level 13 Edberg and counting...
User avatar
djarvik
ITST General Manager
 
Posts: 13329
Joined: Fri, 15 Aug 2008 14:57

Postby Cro Morgan » Thu, 16 Dec 2010 17:37

Borg is the greatest player of all-time. Federer, Nadal, and all the rest, are playing for second.

Image
User avatar
Cro Morgan
ITST Manager
 
Posts: 7194
Joined: Sat, 29 Jan 2005 12:20

Postby Moralspain » Thu, 16 Dec 2010 17:57

In my opinion eras are different, no possible comparison, i'd had liked to see Borg returning 200 km/h serves though
Never underestimate the pain of a person, because in all honesty, everyone is struggling. Some people are just better at hiding it than others.
User avatar
Moralspain
ITST Manager
 
Posts: 7175
Joined: Wed, 04 Apr 2007 13:23
Location: MALLORCA (Balearic Islands)

Postby Cro Morgan » Thu, 16 Dec 2010 18:04

Moralspain wrote:In my opinion eras are different, no possible comparison, i'd had liked to see Borg returning 200 km/h serves though


You're wrong. Borg is the greatest of all-time. You're just gonna have to take my word. :wink:
User avatar
Cro Morgan
ITST Manager
 
Posts: 7194
Joined: Sat, 29 Jan 2005 12:20

Postby djarvik » Thu, 16 Dec 2010 18:05

Moralspain wrote:In my opinion eras are different, no possible comparison, i'd had liked to see Borg returning 200 km/h serves though



ahhhh but that's the beauty, the comparasing done solely withing the era, not between them. The format didn't charge as far as Top 10. Top 10 best players are always the strongest.

I actually thing this is a VERY good indicator.


Borg does seem to be a beast!!!!
Level 13 Edberg and counting...
User avatar
djarvik
ITST General Manager
 
Posts: 13329
Joined: Fri, 15 Aug 2008 14:57

Postby SlicerITST » Thu, 16 Dec 2010 18:09

Cue the discussion that the level was way higher back in those days...3...2...1....
\'Readers are plentiful; thinkers are rare.\'
User avatar
SlicerITST
ITST Manager
 
Posts: 5974
Joined: Sun, 17 Oct 2004 15:17

Postby Mike Rotchtickles » Thu, 16 Dec 2010 18:12

......and lift off. :lol:

Borg was a phenom with that wooden racquet. Unbelievable player physically and mentally.
Image
Mike Rotchtickles
 
Posts: 1605
Joined: Sun, 10 Jul 2005 11:27
Location: Latitude: 29º00´ South of the Equator. Longitude: 24º00´ East of Greenwich.

Postby djarvik » Thu, 16 Dec 2010 18:12

:lol: but that is the thing! It is really irrelevant what level was back then. They played their "own" top 10 and the results are based on that.

B O R G ! ! !
Level 13 Edberg and counting...
User avatar
djarvik
ITST General Manager
 
Posts: 13329
Joined: Fri, 15 Aug 2008 14:57

Re: Match Record vs Top 10 Players

Postby GOA MASTER MDMA » Thu, 16 Dec 2010 18:15

djarvik wrote:
Inactive Player - W/L (% won)

Borg - 67/28 (70.53%) GS (11) *
Becker - 121/65 (65.05%) GS (6) *
Lendl - 119/66 (64.32%) GS (8 ) *
Sampras - 124/71 (63.59%) GS (14) *
McEnroe - 85/64 (57.05%) GS (7) *
Agassi - 109/90 (54.77%) GS (8 ) *
Kuerten - 38/36 (51.35%) GS (3) *
Connors - 84/82 (50.60%) GS (8 ) *
Wilander - 54/54 (50.00%) GS (7) *
Safin - 49/50 (49.49%) GS (2) *
Edberg - 97/114 (45.97%) GS (6) *
Ivanisevic - 60/76 (44.12%) GS (1)
Nastase - 32/41 (43.84%) GS (2) *
Courier - 53/73 (42.06%) GS (4) *
Muster - 37/51 (42.05%) GS (1) *
Bruguera - 33/52 (38.82%) GS (2)
Vilas - 29/53 (35.37%) GS (4)
Chang - 51/94 (35.17%) GS (1)
Krickstein - 19/59 (24.36%)
Kriek - 11/37 (22.92%) GS (2)


wow ,BORIS BECKER is on rank 2 :shock:
this is really surprising me
User avatar
GOA MASTER MDMA
 
Posts: 6974
Joined: Thu, 22 Nov 2007 19:34
Location: GOA - INDIA

Postby Mike Rotchtickles » Thu, 16 Dec 2010 18:19

One thing though,
Borg retired at age 23-24. Would his stats have been as impressive as some of the others who played closer to age 30 and over?

Edit: He was age 25 in his last full season on tour.

Question still stands though.
Last edited by Mike Rotchtickles on Thu, 16 Dec 2010 18:23, edited 1 time in total.
Image
Mike Rotchtickles
 
Posts: 1605
Joined: Sun, 10 Jul 2005 11:27
Location: Latitude: 29º00´ South of the Equator. Longitude: 24º00´ East of Greenwich.

Postby djarvik » Thu, 16 Dec 2010 18:21

I think Edberg just got himself a competition here. I recon Borg is the man now, its official :shock:
Level 13 Edberg and counting...
User avatar
djarvik
ITST General Manager
 
Posts: 13329
Joined: Fri, 15 Aug 2008 14:57

Postby Moralspain » Thu, 16 Dec 2010 18:23

actually after checking those stats again i find them very interesting.
Tsonga will do something great in a near future, he has problems when playing the first rounds,he just needs to have a better mentality, be very focus, same as Marcus, in the other hand Soderling, Verdasco can't play well in the final rounds (supposedly against top 10 guys, i guess).
Never underestimate the pain of a person, because in all honesty, everyone is struggling. Some people are just better at hiding it than others.
User avatar
Moralspain
ITST Manager
 
Posts: 7175
Joined: Wed, 04 Apr 2007 13:23
Location: MALLORCA (Balearic Islands)

Postby GOA MASTER MDMA » Thu, 16 Dec 2010 18:26

bloufo wrote:One thing though,
Borg retired at age 23-24. Would his stats have been as impressive as some of the others who played closer to age 30 and over?


thats a good point- but we never will know this .
in fact he leads this statistic now
User avatar
GOA MASTER MDMA
 
Posts: 6974
Joined: Thu, 22 Nov 2007 19:34
Location: GOA - INDIA

Postby djarvik » Thu, 16 Dec 2010 18:27

I can confidently say now that Verdasco will not win a GS. He should just stop trying.


....on the other hand Vilas :shock: 4 Grand Slam? :lol:
Level 13 Edberg and counting...
User avatar
djarvik
ITST General Manager
 
Posts: 13329
Joined: Fri, 15 Aug 2008 14:57

Postby Moralspain » Thu, 16 Dec 2010 18:29

bloufo wrote:One thing though,
Borg retired at age 23-24. Would his stats have been as impressive as some of the others who played closer to age 30 and over?

Edit: He was age 25 in his last full season on tour.

Question still stands though.


in theory no, you can't keep that level during all your career, i can promise you Nadal won't be winning 3 Grand Slams per year when he's 30, well actually he will be retired
Never underestimate the pain of a person, because in all honesty, everyone is struggling. Some people are just better at hiding it than others.
User avatar
Moralspain
ITST Manager
 
Posts: 7175
Joined: Wed, 04 Apr 2007 13:23
Location: MALLORCA (Balearic Islands)

Next

Return to Pro Tennis

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 8 guests

cron