Shanghai Final: Federer v. Murray

by **riley108** » Sun, 17 Oct 2010 11:10

lol

how well did murray playyy???? it the beggining of the end 4 fed

by **Moralspain** » Sun, 17 Oct 2010 11:15

btw Federer has lost 5 finals this year

by **NARCOSIS2009** » Sun, 17 Oct 2010 11:17

Moralspain wrote:btw Federer has lost 5 finals this year

Its called choking :lol:

by **oDEVLISHo** » Sun, 17 Oct 2010 11:24

And Murray has a winning record against fed he knows how to play him. Apart from in slam situations you have to go with Murray everytime these days ; )

by **Coolhand Texas** » Sun, 17 Oct 2010 13:46

oDEVILISHo wrote:And Murray has a winning record against fed he knows how to play him. Apart from in slam situations you have to go with Murray everytime these days ; )

you appear to be correct there. Congrats murray

by **SoundfSilence** » Sun, 17 Oct 2010 17:27

Ouch... That score must hurt

by **jayl0ve** » Mon, 18 Oct 2010 00:59

Moralspain wrote:
oDEVILISHo wrote:Can you hear the Murray haters sing! No no !

honestly..why so many haters? i don't get it, that guy has talent, and it's hard to find weaknesses in his game

Honestly, I just find his game incredibly ugly, from an aesthetic point of view. The technique on his FH is seriously horrible for a pro, his 2nd serve is bootleg, he's OVERLY defensive-minded, andhe just doesn't play the game of tennis as well and efficiently as perhaps he could. He seems to win despite his game, not because of his game...Pushers can beat anybody on any given day, but they also don't win Slams

Like, ever.

Good for Murray for getting the win I guess, but honestly his game just bores the crap out of me. Pretty much as simple as that.

by **oDEVLISHo** » Mon, 18 Oct 2010 15:56

jayl0ve wrote:
Moralspain wrote:
oDEVILISHo wrote:Can you hear the Murray haters sing! No no !

honestly..why so many haters? i don't get it, that guy has talent, and it's hard to find weaknesses in his game

Honestly, I just find his game incredibly ugly, from an aesthetic point of view. The technique on his FH is seriously horrible for a pro, his 2nd serve is bootleg, he's OVERLY defensive-minded, andhe just doesn't play the game of tennis as well and efficiently as perhaps he could. He seems to win despite his game, not because of his game...Pushers can beat anybody on any given day, but they also don't win Slams Like, ever.

Good for Murray for getting the win I guess, but honestly his game just bores the crap out of me. Pretty much as simple as that.

yawn, i actually did the biggest Yawn reading that lol

imagine how good hes going to be when he fixes all his problems :wink:

by **Coolhand Texas** » Mon, 18 Oct 2010 17:03

There is no fixing murrays problems

by **Moralspain** » Mon, 18 Oct 2010 17:19

what problems?? hahaha... 98% of ATP players would kill to put themselves in his shoes

by **AMAZING ZIZOU** » Mon, 18 Oct 2010 18:28

Moralspain wrote:what problems?? hahaha... 98% of ATP players would kill to put themselves in his shoes

Actually, even less than that.

Theoricaly, only 3 players would like to be his shoes when +/- 1000 are registered. It makes only 0.003 % mate !! :lol:

by **Moralspain** » Mon, 18 Oct 2010 18:56

AMAZING ZIZOU wrote:
Moralspain wrote:what problems?? hahaha... 98% of ATP players would kill to put themselves in his shoes

Actually, even less than that.

Theoricaly, only 3 players would like to be his shoes when +/- 1000 are registered. It makes only 0.003 % mate !!

someone is wrong here hahaha, in my opinion 997 players would like to be Andy Murray, that makes 99.7%....maybe i didn't express myself properly

by **Moralspain** » Mon, 18 Oct 2010 19:18

jayl0ve wrote:
Moralspain wrote:
oDEVILISHo wrote:Can you hear the Murray haters sing! No no !

honestly..why so many haters? i don't get it, that guy has talent, and it's hard to find weaknesses in his game

Honestly, I just find his game incredibly ugly, from an aesthetic point of view. The technique on his FH is seriously horrible for a pro, his 2nd serve is bootleg, he's OVERLY defensive-minded, andhe just doesn't play the game of tennis as well and efficiently as perhaps he could. He seems to win despite his game, not because of his game...Pushers can beat anybody on any given day, but they also don't win Slams Like, ever.

Good for Murray for getting the win I guess, but honestly his game just bores the crap out of me. Pretty much as simple as that.

by **jayl0ve** » Mon, 18 Oct 2010 22:36

oDEVILISHo wrote:
jayl0ve wrote:
Moralspain wrote:
oDEVILISHo wrote:Can you hear the Murray haters sing! No no !

honestly..why so many haters? i don't get it, that guy has talent, and it's hard to find weaknesses in his game

Honestly, I just find his game incredibly ugly, from an aesthetic point of view. The technique on his FH is seriously horrible for a pro, his 2nd serve is bootleg, he's OVERLY defensive-minded, andhe just doesn't play the game of tennis as well and efficiently as perhaps he could. He seems to win despite his game, not because of his game...Pushers can beat anybody on any given day, but they also don't win Slams Like, ever.

Good for Murray for getting the win I guess, but honestly his game just bores the crap out of me. Pretty much as simple as that.

yawn, i actually did the biggest Yawn reading that lol

imagine how good hes going to be when he fixes all his problems :wink:

You really think plastic surgery and braces will make him better?

by **AMAZING ZIZOU** » Mon, 18 Oct 2010 23:06

Moralspain wrote:
AMAZING ZIZOU wrote:
Moralspain wrote:what problems?? hahaha... 98% of ATP players would kill to put themselves in his shoes

Actually, even less than that.

Theoricaly, only 3 players would like to be his shoes when +/- 1000 are registered. It makes only 0.003 % mate !!

someone is wrong here hahaha, in my opinion 997 players would like to be Andy Murray, that makes 99.7%....maybe i didn't express myself properly

I **** it up. I just re read, i was out of it.

Shanghai Final: Federer v. Murray

Who will win?

Who is online