Goa MDMA is banned?

[Cro Morgan]

But wasn't there another case of someone who made a whole thread that his opponent was given the walkover because he was late, why doesn't that apply here

In that case, an extension had been granted. The missed appointment came after the deadline. That's why it doesn't apply here.

[Rob ITST]

But wasn't there another case of someone who made a whole thread that his opponent was given the walkover because he was late, why doesn't that apply here

In that case, an extension had been granted. The missed appointment came after the deadline. That's why it doesn't apply here.

There was another big factor in that match. The player who was late never attempted to reschedule, while his opponent offered to play later. In this case it was the opposite - the player who was late tried to reschedule, while his opponent immediately began asking for a walkover.

Like I said earlier; you get a walkover when you show you are actually trying to play the match, not when you show that you're only trying to get a walkover. If GOA had made any further attempts to play, and they were not able to play, there would have been no question that he deserved the walkover.

[Amazing Matheja]

Will he be able to re-defend himself,or to do a "mea-culpa" once he'll be cooler about this?...(If he just reacted badly about how the things were going,by taking it a bit too seriously-or something like that-It can happens)

[Fredz_x]

People take things so seriously.

[coke4]

Then, he sent me this email:

**** you rob.

YOU A LIAR AND A CHEATER
you the head of this gay inner circle. i know all the other ""PREMIUM MEMBERS "**** you in your ass for beeing ACCEPTED in this inner circle and to got a cheating walkover and at all itst is full of cheating assholes .
1000 other cases proof that .
iŽm banned - no problem than i use and play in future with one of my other accounts i created till you and your gaylord friend cro "ass****er"morgan started to stalking me in forum .
iŽm not a idiot - i created since month 8-10 different inactive accounts. all what you do with banning me is to bring me in underground playing ,without much posting in forum -i will use one of my accounts to play . you never will find all my accounts - forward i will create new accounts-hey with that i can win challenger tournaments . that is cool

He went on like that for another paragraph, and I changed his suspension to a ban.

Something here doesnt add up....

[Q. Reese]

Goa used ban in reference to his suspension. Members tend to interchange these words.

[Rob ITST]

There was a lot of misinterpretation. He thought he was banned at the time that he wrote his email.

Anyway, I've been in communication with GOA a good bit over the past few days and this matter is not settled yet.

[Amazing Matheja]

I know it's kind of "not my business" but may i ask what's happening with Goa now?...Still not able to be back?...
I'm a bit curious since i like the guy and i was thinking "doesn't he deserve some 2nd chance?" (if it's the 1st time he "messes with ITST"...)

[Q. Reese]

Rob said that he was working out something with Goa, but I got the sense that Goa was not cooperating? That is what Rob updated us with.

EDIT: That is not what I said - Rob ITST

[Amazing Matheja]

Ok Q... thanks that helps a lot...You aware that,of course,i was asking this to some other people than "us"?...
Again :
"I know it's kind of "not my business" but may i ask what's happening with Goa now?...Still not able to be back?...
I'm a bit curious since i like the guy and i was thinking "doesn't he deserve some 2nd chance?" (if it's the 1st time he "messes with ITST"...)
"

[Saarbrigga]

I hope he can comeback soon...

And yes: Anyone should get a second chance.

[Mike Rotchtickles]

The events unfold kinda like a soap opera.
The only clear thing here is that the job of an ITST host/management is a thankless one. It's a case of damned if they do and damned if they don't.

[Q. Reese]

EDIT: No need to comment on this, especially if you are just speculating. - Rob ITST

[djarvik]

Q, I think you should not comment on the matter, at all. Don't make statements that have to do with ITST administration as you are not it. If Rob or Cro wish to make a statement - they will.

Most of us understand that you are thrilled that GOA is gone. No need to rub it in.

[Q. Reese]

You said that. That is not true. Also, I was agreeing with McFed, because we clearly see what the administrators did in Goa's case. McFed is right.

Like usual, you can say what you want man, but I know what I am thinking and feeling about this situation.

In fact, I told Rob that it was great that he was considering letting him back after the gross email he sent to him.

I am all about forgiveness, even when it is not warranted!