Poll Federer-Soderling

by **fedfan** » Sun, 07 Jun 2009 16:46

Yes very lucky to get Soderling, I mean who did that gut have to beat? Some sloppy Spaniard called David Ferrer, a weedy Russian named Davydenko, a wacky Chilean by the name of Fernando, oh and some guy called Rafael Nadal who I haven't even heard of.

Honestly any backhanded comments are going right over my head, it's Roger Federer 2009 Roland Garros Champion.

by **oDEVLISHo** » Sun, 07 Jun 2009 16:47

pink moozipan wrote:congratulations to Fed...
of course he knows he´s been lucky too

but a lot of respect for him, he handled the pressure very good !

great to see Agassi on court and sorry to say but you see what´s the difference between Agassi and Federer... Agassi has something that Federer will never have, doesn´t care how many slams he´ll get... and that´s charisma and personality

Agassi never put himself in the position that Fed has! :wink:

by **fedfan** » Sun, 07 Jun 2009 16:50

I was a massive Agassi fan but a lot of the love he got from fans was because of his story of starting off a bit of a brat, then fighting back up the rankings and becoming sort of an elder statesman of the tour.

Federer has been at the top for 6 years. I think we will see warmth for Federer grow even more as he enters the twilight of his career.

by **oDEVLISHo** » Sun, 07 Jun 2009 16:50

wowowowowowowowowowowowowowowowowowowowowowowowowowow

Roger can go on now and win anything else, the sky is the limit. No pressure really now, hes got nothing else to prove.

by **pink moozipan** » Sun, 07 Jun 2009 16:52

fedfan wrote:Yes very lucky to get Soderling, I mean who did that gut have to beat? Some sloppy Spaniard called David Ferrer, a weedy Russian named Davydenko, a wacky Chilean by the name of Fernando, oh and some guy called Rafael Nadal who I haven't even heard of.

Honestly any backhanded comments are going right over my head, it's Roger Federer 2009 Roland Garros Champion.

no i wasn´t talking about the final... but the match against Haas for example.
of course it wasn´t just luck, it´s mental strength too and that was really good

by **ANILTJE** » Sun, 07 Jun 2009 16:52

mr devilish wrote:wowowowowowowowowowowowowowowowowowowowowowowowowowow

Roger can go on now and win anything else, the sky is the limit. No pressure really now, hes got nothing else to prove.

I think will be the best.

He has nothing to prove.

by **fedfan** » Sun, 07 Jun 2009 16:54

Good job he won in three, it is bucketing it down now at Roland Garros.

by **venom400** » Sun, 07 Jun 2009 16:56

Wow a lot of posts to answer ...

First of all , Fed loses to Rafa , and Rafa loses to other guys , if Rafa didn't lose to anyone then I would say he is a tennis god , it just so happens that Rafa has a style that is very uncomfortable for Roger , that is the end of it ,

Everyone agrees Nadal is a beast in clay, the formula to beat Rafa is to over power him with big powerful flat shots , anyone that likes to hit high balls and knows how to hit them hard will beat Rafa.

The way to beat roger is with high balls on his backhand , if you don't have this you will not win , and not only that but since Roger knows everyone is doing this he practices this shot a lot , and with all the players trying this strategy against Roger he is getting better at dealing with this particular shot.

And Roger not having charisma ? are you nuts ? everyone loves him , even his oponents and the fans were actually going for Roger even he was the favorite to win , how is this not charisma ?

Agassi is great , but charisma and class is the name of the game for Roger

And to everyone that talks crap about Roger when he loses but out of the sudden they are his "fans" when they win you guys are hypocrits ,you are either his fan or you are not , I want to see how many people remain Nadal fans if he continues to lose ...fans stick trough good and bad .

Anyways I have to go take my cat out of the microwave I will be right back .

by **venom400** » Sun, 07 Jun 2009 16:59

[url][/url]

by **GUGA_BANNED** » Sun, 07 Jun 2009 17:02

WarGot wrote:
Samael wrote:How are you doing, my AK-47(Kalashnikov) "friend"? Are you angry Hillman constantly beats you? Are you happy Yeikey retired?

Are u sure that Yeikey really retired? I think he will play... anyway I'm not afraid him... about Hillman, yes, he is good now, but if I will in good mental condiotions (I think last lost match and grand slam status is good motivation for me) I can beat him - let's see what will happen in RG SF

I JUST WOLD LIKE REMIND U, MY LAST GAME AGAINST HILLMAN WAS THE SAME SCORE YOUR,

http://www.intertopspintour.net/content ... l-1688.htm

http://www.intertopspintour.net/content ... n-1675.htm

AND IF HE BEAT ME, AFTER HE MUST PLAY AGAINST WILLPETER OR GROMBALI, THEN, WAIT A LITTLE MORE BEFORE TO SPEAK ABOUT SEMIFINAL.
IT'S MOST RECOMMENDED. :wink:

by **GUGA_BANNED** » Sun, 07 Jun 2009 17:08

Samael wrote:
WarGot wrote:
Samael wrote:How are you doing, my AK-47(Kalashnikov) "friend"? Are you angry Hillman constantly beats you? Are you happy Yeikey retired?

Are u sure that Yeikey really retired? I think he will play... anyway I'm not afraid him... about Hillman, yes, he is good now, but if I will in good mental condiotions (I think last lost match and grand slam status is good motivation for me) I can beat him - let's see what will happen in RG SF

We will meet in the final.

The GAME IS PLAYED, NOT SPOKEN OR KEYED.

by **Chris ITST** » Sun, 07 Jun 2009 18:27

I don't think Federer finds his form until he goes deep in to a slam. And looking back people have mentioned loses to Djokovic and Murray etc. Fact is when the guy is on and is at the stage where it matters, he delivers more often than not.

Rafa VS Roger war is plain boring.

Both exceptional players but i honestly cant see Rafa playing many more years the stress he puts on his body.

There is no champions like Sampras or Federer.

by **Samael** » Sun, 07 Jun 2009 18:30

Right. In fact, Federer has only lost GS finals to Nadal (1 Aussie, 3 RG and 1 Wimbly). And his record 20 straight SF in GS is something that won't be achieved until the end of days.

by **Q. Reese** » Sun, 07 Jun 2009 20:20

I said that Fed will win in straights. I never got the chance to post the scoreline though.

Too late for that now . . . I am just glad that the fellow won his 14th grand slam title at the place he desperately wanted to win, Roland Garros.

by **Rob ITST** » Mon, 08 Jun 2009 03:20

Q. Reese wrote:Federer in 4.

Come one Fed!! :0

http://www.intertopspintour.net/forum/v ... 523#101523

Poll Federer-Soderling

Fed or Soda?

Who is online