djarvik wrote:The person who actually came up with this idea of censoring classic literature, or ANY literature, or censoring all together - should be shot with these legal guns that US have.
US gun crime per capita's just gone up.
On a serious note, the arguments against censorship being brought up here sounds great, in theory. But until you are the one being discriminated against then surely you cannot understand the pain these words can cause. This makes is all very easy to say 'no to censorship' and back up with ideal world reasons.
Having a choice of censored and uncensored version as willjonesjr suggested is not a bad idea. More importantly, it is a view from someone who has been affected, which to me is the most important viewpoint.