http://news.bbc.co.uk/sport1/hi/other_s ... 269285.stm
lol!!! And who did he play to get there? Why none other than Stephen Maguire...another 'charged' (verdict of 'not proven' ultimately returned by Scottish courts - 'not proven' = we know you did it, we just couldn't prove it) cheat....
(Maguire link = http://www.guardian.co.uk/sport/2010/ap ... ing-police)
the mind boggles - this would be like having Maradona play, oh, off the top of my head Thierry-cheating-scum-Henry in a football one-on-one....
The whole thing is become a debacle - Barry Hearn, the head honcho these days in snooker terms has introduced new rules preventing future occurences....but....BUT here's the thing - if Higgins' case had come before the WPBSA (the snooker body - World Pool, Billiards and Snooker Association) right now, Higgins would receive a lifetime ban - as it was, he got a 7 month ban. And I'll go to my grave (no time soon hopefully) believing/knowing that Hearn had Higgins throw that match against Davis this time last year.
Irony? Debacle? I'm thinking we need some new adjectives......
On a final note - Higgins case never actually went before a tribunal, as it was supposed to - instead, he plead guilty to the lesser charge of 'bringing the game into disrepute' by not reporting the ukrainian approach. Uh huh.