Moderator: Senior Hosts
G.Dimitrov (BUL) wrote:We will need now only 4 players per team, right?
Yeah, it is written in one of my messages to you. ------ Every team have to have from 4 to 8 players (there can be reserves).BluudyEEfingaz wrote:G.Dimitrov (BUL) wrote:We will need now only 4 players per team, right?
We can say at least 4...and no more than six. Two of the players can serve as alternates in case one of the scheduled players cannot play.
G.Dimitrov (BUL) wrote:Yeah, it is written in one of my messages to you. ------ Every team have to have from 4 to 8 players (there can be reserves).BluudyEEfingaz wrote:G.Dimitrov (BUL) wrote:We will need now only 4 players per team, right?
We can say at least 4...and no more than six. Two of the players can serve as alternates in case one of the scheduled players cannot play.
BluudyEEfingaz wrote:Also G. Dimitrov sent me another fantastic idea that each home team captain chooses the order in which each of the matches are played. I would like each team to come up with there own name and possibly own logo...then choose a court that would represent their home court.
Tamthewasp wrote:I had an idea but it might suck worse than Murray.
1 game could be a 3 way match, it could be the mens or ws or even sim. It could be a best of 3 where max points are available. So you play your standard game then a serve and score of 21 points where you either get 1 point or half a point per point won so a game that ends 21- 15 would be 10.5 points to 7.5 points and also a percentage points match with similar rules. This could be captain v captain or the opposing captains chose the members from each team to play or even the home team chooses the matchup idk it prob sucks tbh.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 25 guests