Agassi and Nadal....

[Painted Crystal]

Why don't try 1 tournment without these cheesy players? Pro tour is 90% Agassi/Nadal, so boring and what frustration to play a match with Wawrinka or another "normal" player against these 2 cheesy monsters.
I think many good players play with the boring duo cause they know this is the only way to win against them.
only IluvBillVal's Tomic was competitive but he' IluvBillVall...
Bad idea?

[Burna747]

Good Idea!

[GuilleGarcia]

Yeah! I agree. Good idea!

[Painted Crystal]

Thx for support Burna and Garcia... 103 members read this post and only 2 want to try a decent row. I can't understand where's the fun playing only with 2 players.
Hi guys and Viva Agassi/Nadal pro tour

[Cro Morgan]

We're not against banning players or set-ups as we've done it before however, we need to see more people upset/complaining about the current rules to implement any sort of change.

Keep in mind, if you ban the use of players, people will simply gravitate to the next top-heavy player. Then you'll see similar outrage, though now they'll be complaining about everyone using, for example, Federer - and then create threads wanting to ban Federer.

[Painted Crystal]

We're not against banning players or set-ups as we've done it before however, we need to see more people upset/complaining about the current rules to implement any sort of change.

Keep in mind, if you ban the use of players, people will simply gravitate to the next top-heavy player. Then you'll see similar outrage, though now they'll be complaining about everyone using, for example, Federer - and then create threads wanting to ban Federer.

Agree with you, I know people will use the next top.
I said to try only 1 tournment without Agassi/Nadal not to ban them.

Every other player has some weak point, Agassi/Nadal in good hand are unplayable against another pro player. In the past Fifa Tee'Tomic lost against Nadal with a bad score and after good performances IluvBillVal's Tomic died.

I remember only 2-3 Federer and 1-2 Borg win a tournment but they were Fifa, Sho, Khult....

Rarely I saw in a Row Chang, Rafter, Sampras, Roddick, Lendl, Wawrinka and when they're is only for 1 or 2 matches. And at the moment only 1 or 2 Djokovic. Great Sorauze's Lendl!!

Im a normal/bad player here, never I used Nad/Aga in the past, what is the result? 1-2 or 3 games against a normal Agassi or Nadal.
Sorry for my request, I was sure it was impossible a row without 91-81 or a MD Nadal but come on guys, try to play with some other Pro.

Thx Cro fro your answer

[GuilleGarcia]

What could be do, is from a certain ranking, for example 10 to 1, which should be the best, or 5-1, only to let them use a few players, for example: Federer, Djokovic, Murray, Courier. . . from 30 to 10 or 5, others including those, and 30 up everyone, including Agassi and Nadal, because it is supposed that this classification, are worst players

[Painted Crystal]

What could be do, is from a certain ranking, for example 10 to 1, which should be the best, or 5-1, only to let them use a few players, for example: Federer, Djokovic, Murray, Courier. . . from 30 to 10 or 5, others including those, and 30 up everyone, including Agassi and Nadal, because it is supposed that this classification, are worst players

Not agree Garcia
1 rule for every player is ITST rule, ranking is not so important.

[GuilleGarcia]

I agree with you and I select Wawrinka for play Mutua Madrid Open

[Painted Crystal]

Great guy, c'mon go to the second round!!!