Safina v Rogowska

by **falks941** » Fri, 05 Mar 2010 20:49

what i find interesting is the fact that safina appeared to be playing real bad, but the stats were in her favour. They both hit 19 winners, Safina hit 11 double faults to Rogowska's 13, and Safina hit 48 errors compared to Rogowska's 65.

65 is a lot of errors!

by **falks941** » Fri, 05 Mar 2010 22:42

Add another 10 doubles and 40 ue's in her match with Kvitova.
She also wasted 3 match-points.[/quote]

I really want to see highlights of her match with Kvitova.

by **Q. Reese** » Fri, 05 Mar 2010 22:55

Sorry man. I am looking all over for this match. What tournament are you talking about? :roll:

From what it looks like, she did not play much in 2010:

http://www.sonyericssonwtatour.com/play ... 7889_13403

by **Coolhand Texas** » Fri, 05 Mar 2010 22:57

why are we even talking about safina?????

by **falks941** » Fri, 05 Mar 2010 23:37

ive caused a lot of confusion here. i was just commenting on rogowska's match with her at the us, considering thats what this topic is about!

I replied to someone else's comment about Kvitova on the previous page. Thanks for searching for the match anyway, it was back in 09 at the US. Dont worry about it

by **Q. Reese** » Fri, 05 Mar 2010 23:39

Oh! That is what I saw for 2010. :lol:

Okay. We are on the same page now. No need to apologize. I did not know about the upset in 2009 at the U.S. Open.

So, I learned something. :lol:

by **djarvik** » Sat, 06 Mar 2010 00:51

Can we get this all confirmed by someone?

by **Coolhand Texas** » Sat, 06 Mar 2010 04:01

I think can we confirm that Q may have learned something but i have no idea what that may be

by **Q. Reese** » Sat, 06 Mar 2010 22:18

Read it again. I think I explained myself clearly. :wink:

"I did not know about the upset in 2009 at the U.S. Open. So, I learned something."

It is not that difficult to see that. :lol:

by **djarvik** » Sat, 06 Mar 2010 22:24

....but it's impossible to confirm.

by **falks941** » Sun, 07 Mar 2010 10:36

djarvik, what are u talking about? :S

what's impossible to confirm?

by **Moralspain** » Sun, 07 Mar 2010 12:24

we´ll have the confirmation

by **GOA MASTER MDMA** » Sun, 07 Mar 2010 16:27

falks941 wrote:djarvik, what are u talking about? :S

what's impossible to confirm?

thats a inside itst running gag - you will understand it soon , i think ...... :roll:

by **emate007** » Sun, 07 Mar 2010 17:08

I think we need falks to confirm that he may soon understand?

by **Coolhand Texas** » Sun, 07 Mar 2010 19:04

Im not sure he will understand, we will need to Q, to thoroughly explain this one. Then maybe he will understand

Safina v Rogowska

Who is online