US OPEN FINAL: Federer or Murray?

by **GOA MASTER MDMA** » Mon, 08 Sep 2008 22:33

Y EVOLUTION Y wrote:
bergkamptheone wrote:Would be he No.1 again if he won it?

No!

thats right,when federer win hes only a few points behind nadal

by **jayl0ve** » Mon, 08 Sep 2008 22:41

I just can't wait to laugh at all the bandwagon-hoppers who've said that Federer is finished. As soon as Federer's play went down for a few months, everybody wrote him off and have even started talking about Nadal breaking ALL his records. :lol:

And whoever said if Roger wins this he doesn't deserve it, is huffing glue. I mean, right away, that assertion is flawed- how can you win a championship, beating all comers, and not 'deserve it'? Is it his fault his draw wasn't more difficult? It's a Slam; the first couple rounds are going to be played against completely nobodys, most of the time. So what if Novak was 'disheartened'? He should be! Roger's 10x the player that he is (or ever will be)- he's a little arrogant bitch that needs to be slapped (like a bitch). Good to see Federer bitch-slapping everybody around again...

...BTW he just won the first set.

by **djgazzabhoy** » Mon, 08 Sep 2008 22:51

i take my comment back

murray is fuc**** awful!

by **jayl0ve** » Mon, 08 Sep 2008 22:53

@Sean Flannery- What would you have said if Djokovic got to the finals, and won the title? I mean, he beat Arnaud Clement, Robert Kendrick, Marin Cilic, Tommy Robredo, and Roddick to get to Federer. Not exactly a 'Who's Who?' of tennis.

Murray had to beat Sergio Roitman (???), Michael Llodra, Juergen Melzer, Stan Wawrinka, and J. M. Del Potro. I know Del Potro's on fire, but again, not exactly the toughest competition.

Both players encountered only 2 quality opponents on their way to losing (or the finals, in Murray's case), much like Federer, who faced only 2 quality opponents as well (Andreev and Stepanek). So let's give Federer a break- it's not his fault he makes everybody else look like utter SHIT.

What would make you think he deserved this title? Who would you prefer that he beat to get to the final, in order to truly deserve it, in your eyes?

by **djgazzabhoy** » Mon, 08 Sep 2008 22:53

i retract that last statement i am on drugs

by **GOA MASTER MDMA** » Mon, 08 Sep 2008 22:58

by **GOA MASTER MDMA** » Mon, 08 Sep 2008 23:01

jayl0ve wrote:I just can't wait to laugh at all the bandwagon-hoppers who've said that Federer is finished. As soon as Federer's play went down for a few months, everybody wrote him off and have even started talking about Nadal breaking ALL his records. And whoever said if Roger wins this he doesn't deserve it, is huffing glue. I mean, right away, that assertion is flawed- how can you win a championship, beating all comers, and not 'deserve it'? Is it his fault his draw wasn't more difficult? It's a Slam; the first couple rounds are going to be played against completely nobodys, most of the time. So what if Novak was 'disheartened'? He should be! Roger's 10x the player that he is (or ever will be)- he's a little arrogant bitch that needs to be slapped (like a bitch). Good to see Federer bitch-slapping everybody around again...

...BTW he just won the first set.

where say this that federer is down now.and nadal breakes allrecords. never ever.nadal normally is a sandspecialist.he play now better and better on grass and hard..maybe in 2-3 years . federer played from a other star on hard court- i like the matches between federer and nadal directly- it is hes good right to say i m the best-he proof this over years.i think hes not arrogant.only cool an konzentrate.so it looks like a bit arrogant

by **TheTriFecta625** » Mon, 08 Sep 2008 23:54

This is about the worst excuse of a grand slam final ever...That's the reason Federer will win this grand slam...not because he deserves it. When you are up 5-1 in a 3rd set, almost dealt out a bagel...in a grand slam final..it's pitiful.

by **jayl0ve** » Tue, 09 Sep 2008 00:02

Hahahaha...it's a terrible excuse for a final because Federer makes his opponents look downright pitiful, when he's playing at 100%. You guys can say whatever you want but Federer's about to win #13. I mean really, what is your point? It doesn't count because he played too well? People have some really bizarre logic.

by **jayl0ve** » Tue, 09 Sep 2008 00:04

If this was Nadal winning some RG final 6-0 6-0 6-0, you guys wouldn't be saying he doesn't deserve it, it would be "Ohhh Nadal is such a beast, nobody can compete", but when Federer hands out a beating, it's because the competition he faced is shit.It's not fair. Oh BTW Federer just won #13 as I typed this.

by **TheTriFecta625** » Tue, 09 Sep 2008 00:08

Why does he celebrate like a baby....he's won 13 and he still falls down like a 12 year old, after winning the worst excuse of a grand slam final in the history of tennis. Serena's celebration was appropriate, Federer's is just him looking like a retard.

by **jayl0ve** » Tue, 09 Sep 2008 00:10

hahahahaha. :lol:

Wow. Don't even know what to say to that one! Some people are just miserable haters!! He could have won the tournament with a wooden leg and a welding mask on, and people would still say he doesn't deserve it!! :lol:

VIVA FEDERER!!! LONG LIVE THE KING.

by **Elargento** » Tue, 09 Sep 2008 00:11

nadal's semifinal streches the difference in points because federer defended the tittle while nadal made a poor performance las year.

by **GOA MASTER MDMA** » Tue, 09 Sep 2008 00:14

with the performance from today,murray yesterday loose about nadal.federer plays in one word....... genius. my personally think is that federer plays the next 7 years in the top3

by **ANILTJE** » Tue, 09 Sep 2008 00:45

Bla bla bla Federer won. Murray didn't rise to the occasion and that pretty normal for his first GS.

And for Federer being emotional ? Well a hard year and then in the end winning the last GS must make you happy . I know it would make me happy for sure :lol:

.Thank god he didn't do the Monfils dance :-)

( which i loved by the way).

US OPEN FINAL: Federer or Murray?

Who will win the US Open?

Who is online