Q. Reese wrote:Yes. I can see that. Wimbledon almost had Roddick's name on the trophy, him having a 15-40 (two break chances on Federer's serve) chance in the fifth set.
I bet you that Roddick was thinking about that, as I often do in my online tennis matches. LOL.
kyuuji wrote:Q. Reese wrote:Yes. I can see that. Wimbledon almost had Roddick's name on the trophy, him having a 15-40 (two break chances on Federer's serve) chance in the fifth set.
I bet you that Roddick was thinking about that, as I often do in my online tennis matches. LOL.
Roddick was almost to beat Federer, but he made a big mistake in the 2nd set, he had many opportunities to win the set.
and to lead 7/5 7/6.
I think if he were to win the set he could win in 4 sets. 7/5 7/6 6/7 6/3.
Q. Reese wrote:kyuuji wrote:Q. Reese wrote:Yes. I can see that. Wimbledon almost had Roddick's name on the trophy, him having a 15-40 (two break chances on Federer's serve) chance in the fifth set.
I bet you that Roddick was thinking about that, as I often do in my online tennis matches. LOL.
Roddick was almost to beat Federer, but he made a big mistake in the 2nd set, he had many opportunities to win the set.
and to lead 7/5 7/6.
I think if he were to win the set he could win in 4 sets. 7/5 7/6 6/7 6/3.
Yea. That and what I said before. Either way, he was sure in the dumps. So, when I saw the post with Djokovic not converting his break and set points. It reminded me of Roddick and Djokovic's match at the U.S. Open final.
Good point; and, this time, Djokovic converted enough to win.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest