Moralspain wrote:before explaining my point, tell me which aspects of the game has Tsonga improved to have chances against a good Ferrer on clay?, i'm gonna be honest i haven't watched any of his matches this year, that's why i'd like to know why everybody talks about him.
In my book i have the best returner nad the most consistency player of the ATP against a player that, on fire, can beat anyone, but on hard court.
We all know Ferrer won't get too many winners but he will return every single ball and will fight at his 100% during 1, 2, 3, 4 , 5, 6, 7 hours,if Tsonga usually get his points in X shots against Ferrer he will need X+1. In my opinion, in the past, he has never been that solid during a best of 5 sets match to hit that "+1".
PS: On hard court, Tsonga would crush Ferrer in 3 sets
I don't think Tsonga has improved that much from last year. But I (and many others) judge players by how much of a chance of beating the big 4. By that measure del potro, berdych, and Tsonga are better than Ferrer. By consistency from tournement to tournement Ferrer is better than them. So if the consistent Ferrer shows up against the Tsonga who had match points against djokivic last year, my money is on Tsonga.
And I feel djokivic is the best returner. Ferrer is the most consistent returner on tour. But djokivic can choose to be an aggressive returner or a consistent returner. He mixes in both, and chooses what he needs at a given point in the match. Ferrer and no one else can match how djokivic does this. But if djokivic chose to only be a consistent returner and get a lot of balls back with less risk, I believe he would be slightly better than Ferrer.
Also this is a unique setting at the French Open, Tsonga isn't Gasquet. Tsonga can feed off that French crowd.