Q. Reese wrote:venom400 wrote:there is nothign wrong with a 16 yeard with a 22 year old , its like a 25 year old with a 32 year old .
Besides guys mature slower than girls
Yea. Tell that to the U.S. government and or most states. You go to jail over that stuff.
I think the laws are draconian and there should be a 3 year linency , for example a 18 year old should be able to date a 15 yard old , a 20 year old should be able to date a 17 year old , as a Mather of fact once you turn 16 you pretty much know what you are doing .
I lost my virginity to a 21 year old girl when I was 15 and I knew exactly what I was doing and the consequences if I got her pregnant.
Granted I was still stupid and I probably could had gotten her pregnant because I tought going by "fertile days" was a sufficent
Yes I was young and stupid , but I know one thing , when I turned 18 I wasn't any smarter than when I was 17 or 16 , if anything my new found freedom (and extremely sudden ) made me ever more reckless .
another thing is that I didn't stop being attracted to girls that were 16 when I was 18 , and 16 year old girls were sure attracted to me even more than I had a car .
Would any girl decided to get "even" at me I would had been branded a predator for having a sex with a girl 2 years younger than me and that by all technical porpuses were still going to the same school as me.
I saddens me when I run the predator report and I see someone charged for having "lewd acts with a girl under 17" age of conviction "19" it is just not fair .
And really what makes someone and "adult" ready to make decisions at age 18 that they couldn't make at 16? you still the same young moron .
That is why I don't agree with statuary rape
"It's nice to be important , but it's more important to be nice" Roger Federer .
"All who gain power are afraid to lose it , even the Jedi" Emperador Palpatine .
Venom400 the Classic Tennis player.