Bowler2151 wrote:More athleticism may give someone a slight advantage but that doesnt always translate to wins. It took about one full season to figure out Vick and any team with an average defense at best could shut him down for the most part. So he had to learn to actually be able to read defenses and become a better passer. Plus he gets hurt all the time.
The Miami Heat struggled at first because they had all these athletic freaks but they didnt know to play with each other so they struggled for a while. Then when they got to the finals they played a team that can shoot really well and the Miami Heat for the most part espically Leborn cant shoot that well. Miami most relied on there athleticism and it ended up costing them. Pure athleticism doesnt always translate to winning.
jayl0ve wrote:One thing's for certain, I'm pretty sure black athletes are never gonna take over ice hockey.
Bowler2151 wrote:Where do you get idea the better athleles are poor? I disagree with that completely
Rob ITST wrote:Bowler2151 wrote:Where do you get idea the better athleles are poor? I disagree with that completely
I've been trying to find the logic in that as well. I assume it's for one of two reasons:
Poor people have to work harder.
or
There are a higher percentage of poor people who are black than rich people.
Personally, I'm not buying that. However, maybe poor people are more likely to choose sports as a means to make money - which is a shame, because you have a higher chance of becoming a brain surgeon than you do at becoming a highly paid professional athlete.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 3 guests