Now, I think (and if not I try) to be a fair player, I remember to had had just a few of discussions, mainly solved almost instantly and always with the same players (yeah, I'm talking about you mohd, you are always the worst
). I've always thought that consistency in being fairly is the primary form of courtesy both in life and in ITST. In our community it is revealed in paying attention to a series of behaviors such as be precise in match fixing, asking who prefers to host, apologize on lucky points and so on; but there some basical problems which cannot be solved so easily.As I am a law practicer, I tend to focus on what we called effectivenes of the rules; a rule should be first told, than the community must find a way to make the rules being respected otherwise the rules is just said but it does not STAND; a rule that stands is an effective rule. Than after a system of rules has been approved there is another primary matter: what happends if two rules are incompatible one each other? That's the problem of rules BALANCING; the deeper the rules are clearly balanced the more is high the civility level of a community. Ok, simply in this community there are a lot rules that are nor effective, neither clearly balanced, and know, despite my english, I'll try to give the best picture of what I mean.
There is a list of rule which seems to be clear and it is the quote
"In real life you need a decent racket and a decent court to play a match in good conditions. In the same way, it's a player responsibility to bring a decent hardware and a decent internet connexion to play matches in decent conditions.
This is an important point to preserve a good gaming experience and keep matches competitive in the right way among the tour. Very poor hardware or connexion leading to extreme lag may lead a player to be suspended until the issue is fixed".
In another post by djarvik it seems that the delay allowed is 100-150 and just because if the connection is stable and doesn't have spikes it can be the half of the ping.
It seems clear or isn't it?
No. this is not the situation I faced. After 20 min of playing against cahill I realized that conditions were totally unplayable: lag 217, 1% of lost packages, spikes from 350 to 800 and even 1080, freezin
g turtles and so on, and all of that was cycling every 5-6 minutes;I claim the for the applying of the rules above to find an equal solution but don, the host, sais that I agreed to play in that conditions and so the match was supposed to be ended, and I couldn't ask neither for the coin toss.
After the suspension situation was even worse, with all the same but 10% of lost packages, I was in advantage after the first suspension and we were equal when I decided to retire.
How the rules work? I provide a stable connection, I see my opponent having 217 delay, I decide to see if it is playable because I don't wanna have discussions and I wanna respect the importance of a RG quaterfinal, and don't I have the right of testing the playability of the game even if I have respected a primary rule? And then, don't I have the right to ask for a coin toss because I need the agreement of the other who has not provide a stable and decent connection? Has the host the right to decide ABSLOLUTELY according to his will something that would be much better to be fixed by the community? And if the others disagree what happends?
I have had some pm with c4hill, and he told me that I'm uncapable to deal with turtles, I'm a pussy and so on, because turtles and delay are like the wind, and so both players suffer the chaos of luck.
I'm sorry guys, I don't agree, it is not the wind, that is c4hill's wind, and c4hill's delay. Everyone is supposed play in HIS court but he never plays in a fair court (of course I'm talking about c4hill but it would stand for anyone else).
After I had retired isaldor and vmoe said both they would have taken different decisions, and vmoe stated that the maximum lag he had faced was 187; before the match against c4hill it was the same for me, it was against thiagolima, but the connection was stable, the match was playable and I thought it was a match I could have lost fairly; even with mohd, the sporadic turtles are counterbalanced with a 150 delay, that make tollerable the unoptimal connection, I lost against him this year, just congrats and stop.
Is it possible to know precisely how this matter are judged? Everyone of us knows this game, it is so complex and requires, especially at the beginning, A LOT OF TIME AND SACRIFICE. We want to expand our community, right? So, can we finally deal with this sort of troubles, this time it is mine but it's gonna always afflict others, especially rookies and newcomers.
And for you admins and hosts, is it possible to stop for a while and examine the fact that our rules should be improved and are supposed to be better balanced? I really feel disoriented and disappointed, and since I have passed more than one year on the community I hope answers would come soon.
p.s. this is my first post, I decided to talk a bit more in order to pinpoint the object at the best I could, if someone is disturbed by its length I apologize, but it was really an hard stroke. And just as I said to him, I have nothing personal against c4hill, I think in fair conditions we can play beautiful matches; simply I can't stand this state of things.
bye and thanks
), and I hope to see you back here.
