I understand that risk is important and true to real life tennis... which is why I commend Norberto again for his mastery of the risk game.

You are also correct in saying that Norberto's skill at risking surpasses almost ALL of the competition in the ITST...based on his relentless dominance of the Rankings (:twisted:). Yeah he'd have some losses, but I'd rarely see Norberto in TS3 losing 1-6, 0-6 to anyone.
Although risk isn't there, there's still some degree of shot selection, and they accentuated that with the "control" shots. They did make it somewhat more arcadey, but then again if you look at the videos for VT4, TS4 has a loooong descent to get to that level of simplicity and brainless ball-striking

(dare I mention Smash Court Tennis 3?? ...sidebar::roll: why does everybody hate that game so much anyways?!?:cry: The worker at gamestop almost banned me from the store for buying it when I had a 360

...but I digress...). There's still an element of risk in TS4 in that you have to say "ok I can't just wail on every ball" because if you do, more likely than not you'll find yourself in a defensive position on the run.
I don't feel it's ludicrous to compare ItaStallion to Norberto, because just as you say Norberto "outsmarted" his opponents, ItaStallion is a SMART player. Also, you can still out-fight ppl in TS4, that element is not lost. You can see this in the 7-6 first sets and the 6-1 second sets. One lapse of concentration against these top guys and you're DONE. In terms of the risking, Norberto is the undisputed champ, but that was TS3. In TS4, the risk factor doesn't involve just pressing a button anymore
It's like how people compared Federer to Sampras; they had two different eras and two different generations of the game to play. Just as Norberto dominated TS3, ItaStallion is showing just as much promise to be a dominant force in TS4 but within the TS4 parameters.
