Can we also have a pro players tour ?

[TomBs]

Thanks for the confidence Al

Anyway, since you put it that way I'd say ban Roddick.

[VillaJ100]

we could do the sim tester and let the crappiest player pick first, that way some noob would have roddick! me

[Coolhand Texas]

Thanks for the confidence Al

Anyway, since you put it that way I'd say ban Roddick.

I think hes saying, even if you ban roddick it would be somebody else. Probably rafa

[AndyMurray ITST]

Im not so sure! i beat roddick the other day with murray online! it cant be that bad! I think we should at least give it a try. I dont think everyone would pick roddick and if they did we have to combat them!

[djarvik]

Roddick is just an example of a strong setup. In any configuration of online tennis gaming, there is 1 setup that dominates most. Pros or created. Doesnt matter.

With created players we will have more viraity. With Pros - we will be playing same guy all the time.

Andy, I am not saying that it is impossible to beat Roddick, of course it is. But what I am saying is that Roddick type will dominate the Top ranks. Sorta of 15 out of top 20 will be Roddicks.

You will have the same with Customs. But they will all look different and have different strokes and clothes. So it will a bit different.

[TomBs]

You can pick a different outfit for Roddick

I'm not sure if it will be true what you say. I'll have to play him first.

[djarvik]

If not Roddick, then someone else Roddick is an example, nothing more.

[Moralspain]

mmm....i'm late

[Elias]

I'd like this to happen. Randomized select orders, or just randomized handing out the pros to the participants would be the most fun in the long run I think.

And/or if you win one tournament you have to pick a pro last for the next.

Here is some sexy idea. Not as a main tour but then call it the "fun" tour. Enforcing to play with different (randomized) setups(pros) each tourneys. This will enforce more variety in such a fun tour than in the main/sim one with created characters where people will probably stick with cookie cutter dominant builds.

Will be also interesting in the long run to see who can be the best player using different characters and styles. And if there is one char clearly over the pack then maybe just remove it.

[tenjintenkai]

i think Roddick is an excellent exemple and would be very much the number 1 choice.
BTW your little scenario made me laugh, thanks for the good time

[Moralspain]

Thanks for the confidence Al

Anyway, since you put it that way I'd say ban Roddick.

I think hes saying, even if you ban roddick it would be somebody else. Probably rafa

don't worry about how many players would use Roddick, there would always be axxxholes i meant "romantics", like me, Djarvik, Anil, Baghdad and many others who don't care about winning , problem is that i'm the only guy who really never wins anything hahaha

[JJ_DUBZ_87]

What if there's a limit to how many tournaments you can play as any specific player?

Say I use Roddick for 3 tourneys and I make it to the SF of all 3 of them, then it's time to switch players. That or if I win those 3 tourneys with Roddick, then I have to switch pros.

What do u guys think of that?

[djarvik]

..aaaannnnnnddd who is going to keep track of it? for every player?

[TomBs]

Usually Assistant Managers have to keep track of the crap.

[JJ_DUBZ_87]

that's right Tombs sooo that would mean....

Oh hey Al that's you!! lol