Now i am gonna be quoting Djarvik from page 17 of this thread (skip to last line if u dont wanna read the WOT
"First, props to VILARCANE! He is Exceptional mover on the court, reminds me of Humburgeboy and Boghdad Kebab.
I enjoyed our match a lot, he challenged me on every point. Although I disagree about the whole "No Risk" philosophy, because of Lack of Errors in particular, I would love for VILARCANE to join ITST tourney and look past risk, just try dude! ....Humburgerboy doesn't use risk at all, he is TOP14 and rising!
...\...
This tells me, that if you want to play Soldering style, you will HAVE to risk. While your player looked fantastic visually, game style wise he was more like Hewitt, a counter puncher.....
Dude, if you embrace risk, you will easily be a TOP20 maybe even Higher!
I think I also understand all the people that are against risk now. I have noticed a pattern:
Anyone who doesn't use risk is a Great mover. Why? Simple:
The are constantly Holding either LB or RB, or both, on every shot.
Now, that limits their ability to use risk, as it is being pressed by the same finger that hold RB or LB Hence they are all against the risk, because it is simply too hard to do with one finger.
I, for example, rarely if ever use RB or LB. Only in certain situations and usually tap it rather then hold, I need my finger for risking
So here is your answer. Both styles ARE effective, one is attaching, the other is defensive.
No need to argue! "
so...no need to argue
_________________
ONE DAY, GULBIS WILL BE NUMBER ONE AND GULBIS HATERS MUST LEARN TO ACCEPT IT!
ITST Title count: 48
