My CAP pros in pictures...

[TomBs]

well in my opinion you start off with creations that can be improved on but you dont realise it, and sometimes you start off with bad creations but you are clearly always capable of better. i apoligise if i offended you it wasnt my intention.

anyway im gonna attempt to make mahut next does anyone have a formula for me please to help??? i think vilarcanes and mack2300 are REALLY good. i know mahut is like 150 in the world but his overall seems over 70 to me, id say.....fh 64 bh 62 power 76 volley 77 serve 85 stamina 88 speed 64 return 52, anyone disagree?

Ask yourself, does Mahut have a better serve then Federer?

federers serve is underated on ts3 and i done those stats from the isner match i dont think federers woulda got over 100 aces in my opinion

hmmm....what makes you think its under-rated. And if you take Fed-Rodick Wimbledon match time (Fed hit 50+) and factor the time Isner Mahut played....you will get more then 100.

federes serve should be atleast 80 i think, k i suppose i overated mahuts serve but i think his serve was the only thing that kept him going against isner, he nearly got as many aces against isner who is without question one of the top two best servers in proffesional tennis

Once again, why it "should" be 80? The only thing kept Mahut going was Isner....who is horrid returner to start with, but especially so when tired.

fair enough, just isner didnt reach many of his serves and isner usually stops players getting ALOT of aces cause of his 6'9 body. considering isner is the second best server in tennis at the moment and mahut nearly matched isner for aces in the 70 68 match and mahut outaced him in their only other meeting and with roddicks serve as 95 lol i had reason

Aces have nothing to do with serve rating (per se) I could ace with 58 serve just fine. I think Federer is overdone in TS3...not under.

Isner simply didn't try on half of these games, he rested during a lot of points on Mahuts serve...hence so many aces. Mahut is a decent server... but far, far from the best...I could place a ton of guys in front of him.

If I would make Mahut, I would make him sub 70 overall. He is really pales in comparasing with some other players in the game.

Good guy, lots of hear and fitness.....not so much in talent department.

you think federers serve should be below 71!!! what would you put mahuts stats as then?

sorry i just wanted to "quote", yeah i know childish behavior

Really childish behaviour

yes very childish behavior by everybody involved

BTW this looks pretty cool

i remembered just a few days after i joined i created a thread saying let's quote each other's message so we create the largest quote ever lol but it was closed..

Yes I remember that as well I think. Maybe some others can confirm this?

On another note I have to agree that sam's Llodra is better than Vilacarne's. Sam just got the facial expression spot on.

[kyuuji]

well in my opinion you start off with creations that can be improved on but you dont realise it, and sometimes you start off with bad creations but you are clearly always capable of better. i apoligise if i offended you it wasnt my intention.

anyway im gonna attempt to make mahut next does anyone have a formula for me please to help??? i think vilarcanes and mack2300 are REALLY good. i know mahut is like 150 in the world but his overall seems over 70 to me, id say.....fh 64 bh 62 power 76 volley 77 serve 85 stamina 88 speed 64 return 52, anyone disagree?

Ask yourself, does Mahut have a better serve then Federer?

federers serve is underated on ts3 and i done those stats from the isner match i dont think federers woulda got over 100 aces in my opinion

hmmm....what makes you think its under-rated. And if you take Fed-Rodick Wimbledon match time (Fed hit 50+) and factor the time Isner Mahut played....you will get more then 100.

federes serve should be atleast 80 i think, k i suppose i overated mahuts serve but i think his serve was the only thing that kept him going against isner, he nearly got as many aces against isner who is without question one of the top two best servers in proffesional tennis

Once again, why it "should" be 80? The only thing kept Mahut going was Isner....who is horrid returner to start with, but especially so when tired.

fair enough, just isner didnt reach many of his serves and isner usually stops players getting ALOT of aces cause of his 6'9 body. considering isner is the second best server in tennis at the moment and mahut nearly matched isner for aces in the 70 68 match and mahut outaced him in their only other meeting and with roddicks serve as 95 lol i had reason

Aces have nothing to do with serve rating (per se) I could ace with 58 serve just fine. I think Federer is overdone in TS3...not under.

Isner simply didn't try on half of these games, he rested during a lot of points on Mahuts serve...hence so many aces. Mahut is a decent server... but far, far from the best...I could place a ton of guys in front of him.

If I would make Mahut, I would make him sub 70 overall. He is really pales in comparasing with some other players in the game.

Good guy, lots of hear and fitness.....not so much in talent department.

you think federers serve should be below 71!!! what would you put mahuts stats as then?

sorry i just wanted to "quote", yeah i know childish behavior

Really childish behaviour

yes very childish behavior by everybody involved

BTW this looks pretty cool

i remembered just a few days after i joined i created a thread saying let's quote each other's message so we create the largest quote ever lol but it was closed..

Just because after there's some bug..

[Gemini]

Whats the point of Quoting non stop ? Coz they clearly isnt 1 ... Back on topic please

[coke4]

well in my opinion you start off with creations that can be improved on but you dont realise it, and sometimes you start off with bad creations but you are clearly always capable of better. i apoligise if i offended you it wasnt my intention.

anyway im gonna attempt to make mahut next does anyone have a formula for me please to help??? i think vilarcanes and mack2300 are REALLY good. i know mahut is like 150 in the world but his overall seems over 70 to me, id say.....fh 64 bh 62 power 76 volley 77 serve 85 stamina 88 speed 64 return 52, anyone disagree?

Ask yourself, does Mahut have a better serve then Federer?

federers serve is underated on ts3 and i done those stats from the isner match i dont think federers woulda got over 100 aces in my opinion

hmmm....what makes you think its under-rated. And if you take Fed-Rodick Wimbledon match time (Fed hit 50+) and factor the time Isner Mahut played....you will get more then 100.

federes serve should be atleast 80 i think, k i suppose i overated mahuts serve but i think his serve was the only thing that kept him going against isner, he nearly got as many aces against isner who is without question one of the top two best servers in proffesional tennis

Once again, why it "should" be 80? The only thing kept Mahut going was Isner....who is horrid returner to start with, but especially so when tired.

fair enough, just isner didnt reach many of his serves and isner usually stops players getting ALOT of aces cause of his 6'9 body. considering isner is the second best server in tennis at the moment and mahut nearly matched isner for aces in the 70 68 match and mahut outaced him in their only other meeting and with roddicks serve as 95 lol i had reason

Aces have nothing to do with serve rating (per se) I could ace with 58 serve just fine. I think Federer is overdone in TS3...not under.

Isner simply didn't try on half of these games, he rested during a lot of points on Mahuts serve...hence so many aces. Mahut is a decent server... but far, far from the best...I could place a ton of guys in front of him.

If I would make Mahut, I would make him sub 70 overall. He is really pales in comparasing with some other players in the game.

Good guy, lots of hear and fitness.....not so much in talent department.

you think federers serve should be below 71!!! what would you put mahuts stats as then?

sorry i just wanted to "quote", yeah i know childish behavior

Really childish behaviour

yes very childish behavior by everybody involved

BTW this looks pretty cool

i remembered just a few days after i joined i created a thread saying let's quote each other's message so we create the largest quote ever lol but it was closed..

Just because after there's some bug..

wow this was before my time here, sad I missed it

[Coolhand Texas]

well in my opinion you start off with creations that can be improved on but you dont realise it, and sometimes you start off with bad creations but you are clearly always capable of better. i apoligise if i offended you it wasnt my intention.

anyway im gonna attempt to make mahut next does anyone have a formula for me please to help??? i think vilarcanes and mack2300 are REALLY good. i know mahut is like 150 in the world but his overall seems over 70 to me, id say.....fh 64 bh 62 power 76 volley 77 serve 85 stamina 88 speed 64 return 52, anyone disagree?

Ask yourself, does Mahut have a better serve then Federer?

federers serve is underated on ts3 and i done those stats from the isner match i dont think federers woulda got over 100 aces in my opinion

hmmm....what makes you think its under-rated. And if you take Fed-Rodick Wimbledon match time (Fed hit 50+) and factor the time Isner Mahut played....you will get more then 100.

federes serve should be atleast 80 i think, k i suppose i overated mahuts serve but i think his serve was the only thing that kept him going against isner, he nearly got as many aces against isner who is without question one of the top two best servers in proffesional tennis

Once again, why it "should" be 80? The only thing kept Mahut going was Isner....who is horrid returner to start with, but especially so when tired.

fair enough, just isner didnt reach many of his serves and isner usually stops players getting ALOT of aces cause of his 6'9 body. considering isner is the second best server in tennis at the moment and mahut nearly matched isner for aces in the 70 68 match and mahut outaced him in their only other meeting and with roddicks serve as 95 lol i had reason

Aces have nothing to do with serve rating (per se) I could ace with 58 serve just fine. I think Federer is overdone in TS3...not under.

Isner simply didn't try on half of these games, he rested during a lot of points on Mahuts serve...hence so many aces. Mahut is a decent server... but far, far from the best...I could place a ton of guys in front of him.

If I would make Mahut, I would make him sub 70 overall. He is really pales in comparasing with some other players in the game.

Good guy, lots of hear and fitness.....not so much in talent department.

you think federers serve should be below 71!!! what would you put mahuts stats as then?

sorry i just wanted to "quote", yeah i know childish behavior

Really childish behaviour

yes very childish behavior by everybody involved

BTW this looks pretty cool

i remembered just a few days after i joined i created a thread saying let's quote each other's message so we create the largest quote ever lol but it was closed..

Just because after there's some bug..

wow this was before my time here, sad I missed it

could someone please explain to gemini what the point of quoting nonstop is?

[Yippie-Caiay]

well in my opinion you start off with creations that can be improved on but you dont realise it, and sometimes you start off with bad creations but you are clearly always capable of better. i apoligise if i offended you it wasnt my intention.

anyway im gonna attempt to make mahut next does anyone have a formula for me please to help??? i think vilarcanes and mack2300 are REALLY good. i know mahut is like 150 in the world but his overall seems over 70 to me, id say.....fh 64 bh 62 power 76 volley 77 serve 85 stamina 88 speed 64 return 52, anyone disagree?

Ask yourself, does Mahut have a better serve then Federer?

federers serve is underated on ts3 and i done those stats from the isner match i dont think federers woulda got over 100 aces in my opinion

hmmm....what makes you think its under-rated. And if you take Fed-Rodick Wimbledon match time (Fed hit 50+) and factor the time Isner Mahut played....you will get more then 100.

federes serve should be atleast 80 i think, k i suppose i overated mahuts serve but i think his serve was the only thing that kept him going against isner, he nearly got as many aces against isner who is without question one of the top two best servers in proffesional tennis

Once again, why it "should" be 80? The only thing kept Mahut going was Isner....who is horrid returner to start with, but especially so when tired.

fair enough, just isner didnt reach many of his serves and isner usually stops players getting ALOT of aces cause of his 6'9 body. considering isner is the second best server in tennis at the moment and mahut nearly matched isner for aces in the 70 68 match and mahut outaced him in their only other meeting and with roddicks serve as 95 lol i had reason

Aces have nothing to do with serve rating (per se) I could ace with 58 serve just fine. I think Federer is overdone in TS3...not under.

Isner simply didn't try on half of these games, he rested during a lot of points on Mahuts serve...hence so many aces. Mahut is a decent server... but far, far from the best...I could place a ton of guys in front of him.

If I would make Mahut, I would make him sub 70 overall. He is really pales in comparasing with some other players in the game.

Good guy, lots of hear and fitness.....not so much in talent department.

you think federers serve should be below 71!!! what would you put mahuts stats as then?

sorry i just wanted to "quote", yeah i know childish behavior

Really childish behaviour

yes very childish behavior by everybody involved

BTW this looks pretty cool

i remembered just a few days after i joined i created a thread saying let's quote each other's message so we create the largest quote ever lol but it was closed..

Just because after there's some bug..

wow this was before my time here, sad I missed it

could someone please explain to gemini what the point of quoting nonstop is?

mm im not sure stop doing it please

[jayl0ve]

This thread is so frickin weird

[VILARCANE]

Gemini had the opportunity to see the pro above my second take at llodra in game (as well as my baghdatis), i will let him comment if he wants...

My pick at ??? (unfortunately unavailable with a tad longer haircut)



let's comment...

and cuz i really gotta stop the creation frenzy now (yeah i know said that once too many times ), here is a quick summary of the pros i am most proud of, with whom i sweep the silly quotes away




















That'll be all, gentlemen, thank you for your support...still available for comments and tips...and a game or two, if you play more sim than risk

[djarvik]

There cannot be SIM with no risk.

[Coolhand Texas]

i just new djarvik had to say something about that

[djarvik]

Always, you can bet on it.

[sam250]

The Moselle tournament winner, one of my best creations I swear no kidding I let you tell your impressions

[VILARCANE]

Sam plz dont start with the usual selfsatisfaction, let us share ur enthusiasm first. And at least start by saying my Gasquet >> yours (@emate) :lol
Now bout ur Simon face is a piece of art but you should go for another haircut this one is too short/not enveloping enuff makes the face seem way to round. I would have chosen a sharper more textured complexion maybe but nitpicking here. So Change haircut and repost IMO other than that good work

ps : and let us guess if ur confident in ur work

[emate007]

And at least start by saying my Gasquet >> yours (@emate) :lol

eh? Don't quite understand what you mean?

[SoundfSilence]

Vilarcane's just saying:

Vilarcane's Gasquet >> Sam's Gasquet

Since the >> was what you used previously emate, he acknowledged you