
Moderator: Senior Hosts
alex13090 wrote:I don't think nito needs much suerte
nitoflament wrote:Undoubtedly was a battle of two gladiators fighting each ball, each point was worth gold and determined who was sending the match. Neither held the lead throughout the match, if not that was changed from hand to hand. The services were the big players, has a throw lonamer very difficult to read (similar to maximo), made so many aces and achievement keep firm without complications during their games. Honestly now that I earn lonamer rose with the left foot and I took my chances, we played a nice game and I am grateful to be in another final of a grand slam.
maximo wrote:come on guys, i know that was an accident, the thing is that he broke a rule in one of the most important points of the match, and i acept when i play with bucci that i can lose his stamina advantage if we disconnect, i didn't want restart from 6-6 in tie break because then his fault wouldn't be punished, i would lose my advantage with 90 stamina, but what would lonamer lose? And he is who broke the rule, not me. i would like to know what would have said petrelli if i had returned inside the court by accident in his mp in Wimbledon WS, or djarvik when i had mp in our last match, and tone, when u break a rule in a game (football, basketball, F1, ... ), by accident or not u are punished, and in tennis if u touch the net u lose the point, the point is repeated when the referees make a mistake, i don't know if someone understand me, i am not sayiing that lonamer is not a clean player at all, simply that there are a rules, nothing more.
Lonamer11 wrote:maximo wrote:come on guys, i know that was an accident, the thing is that he broke a rule in one of the most important points of the match, and i acept when i play with bucci that i can lose his stamina advantage if we disconnect, i didn't want restart from 6-6 in tie break because then his fault wouldn't be punished, i would lose my advantage with 90 stamina, but what would lonamer lose? And he is who broke the rule, not me. i would like to know what would have said petrelli if i had returned inside the court by accident in his mp in Wimbledon WS, or djarvik when i had mp in our last match, and tone, when u break a rule in a game (football, basketball, F1, ... ), by accident or not u are punished, and in tennis if u touch the net u lose the point, the point is repeated when the referees make a mistake, i don't know if someone understand me, i am not sayiing that lonamer is not a clean player at all, simply that there are a rules, nothing more.
You now make it souns like you had a matchpoint when it happened. You didnt even had a setpoint then. Why didnt you stop immediately? You had a very easy ball and lots of time. You could have stopped easily. But first you played the point, you lost the rally, and then you decided i needed to be punished. You talk about games. Take tennis for example. When a player knows a ball is out and he keeps playing the rally and ends op losing the point, he cant then complain about it afterwards and expects too get the point. With football the same. It doesnt work like that. And for the record i didnt break any rule.
We had a fun match with lots of rallies, it was awesome. Even though i ws 2-1 sets up i didnt know what was gonna happen. It was very exciting. And then that happens. First you send me a message that i cheated and despited you. And then you boldly end the match.
maximo wrote:congrats alex, a player like u deserve a GS ("suerte" is for those in search)
and congrats nito for a new final, u always play well in important tournaments.
and suerte is luck, i will say in spanish , maybe my translation has not been good, i mean that "La suerte es para quien la busca"alex13090 wrote:maximo wrote:congrats alex, a player like u deserve a GS ("suerte" is for those in search)
and congrats nito for a new final, u always play well in important tournaments.
Whoops I thought suerte was luck or something.![]()
Thanks man
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests